How did the Nazis and the khmer rouge each rose to power

2 answers:

8 0

Both of those regimes rose to power shortly after or during war; in a way, taking advantage of the social and economic instability. The Khmer Rouge rose to power during the Cambodian civil war and the Nazis rose to power shortly after WWI. <span />

ICE Princess25 [194]3 years ago

7 0

Both the Nazis and the Khmer Rouge rose to power during times of political unrest and economic despair in their countries. Adolf Hitler and the Nazis gained support and power by blaming left-wing politicians, communists, and Jews for the defeat of Germany in World War I and the subsequent problems the country faced in the late 1920s and early 1930s. As the German economy improved under Nazi rule, Hitler and the Nazis gained more power.

The Khmer Rouge gained power during a similar time of struggle in Cambodia. Cambodians had battled French colonization for decades. In the early 1970s, while the Vietnam War raged on the Cambodian border, a military coup supported by the United States toppled the Cambodian government. A civil war soon began, and the Cambodian communist party, also known as the Khmer Rouge, became a major factor in the fighting. As the fighting continued, more Cambodians began supporting the Khmer Rouge, who soon gained control of the country by defeating those who had led the military coup.

You might be interested in

What did Reaganomics do?

topjm [15]

Reaganomics worked on reducing the spending on the military. Thus the correct answer is B.

<h3>What is the Reaganomics?</h3>

The economic policy which is based on elements that include regulation policy, fiscal policy, and taxation policy is called Reaganomics. The objective of this policy is to raise the spending for the military to strengthen the security system.

This will focus on extending the great society to improve the economic conditions of the country and providing means of services to its citizens to improve their standard of living.

Therefore, option B Extending the great society is the appropriate answer.

Learn more about Reaganomics, here:

brainly.com/question/12814840

#SPJ1

6 0

2 years ago

What happened last?

ArbitrLikvidat [17]

Answer:

the declaration of independence was issued

5 0

3 years ago

How did the War of 1812 impact Omaha?

Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

In the War of 1812, the United States took on the greatest naval power in the world, Great Britain, in a conflict that would have an immense impact on the young country’s future. Causes of the war included British attempts to restrict U.S. trade, the Royal Navy’s impressment of American seamen and America’s desire to expand its territory.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Which one of these is not an example of intercellular communication? Question 5 options: A message travels between gap junctions

daser333 [38]

Inter cellular communication involves transmission of information among cells of the body which are located far apart while intra cellular communication involve transmission of information within a cell. the correct answer to this question is 'a message is distributed across plasma membrane', this is because that is an example of intra cellular communication.

7 0

3 years ago

Compare and contrast the regional cultures and economies of the English, French, and Spanish areas of control in the Americas. H

Dennis_Churaev [7]

British Colonies in the Americas were established by royal charter. French colonies started as fur trading posts and then developed later to common colonies. Spanish colonies were crown-sponsored conquests to find riches such as gold and silver.

The British colonies had population mostly from colonists that were recruited among middle-class farmers, servants, and convicted criminals. French colonies population were initially traders, merchants and missionaries, later some soldiers were given land there. Spanish colonies population consisted of conquerors, soldiers and missionaries.

The economy from each colony was different, in the British colony the economy was diverse and included mostly farming, fishing and trading products like tobacco, rice, timber, and fish. The French colony economy like said before, was established over fur trade and some plantations on the Mississippi valley. The Spanish colonies economy was a trading economy that consisted of farming but it was heavily regulated by the Spanish crown.

The British colony started with a friendly relationship with the Native Americans, eventually, things changed when they needed to get new land. The French colony relationship with Native Americans was good, they respected them and forged alliances. Spanish colony relationship with Native Americans was bad when they were not killed by soldiers, they were subjugated or converted to Christianity.

5 0

3 years ago