Stamina, strength and suppleness start to decline. Mobility becomes more of a challenge. Difficulties with fine motor skills that control coordination and dexterity. Skin loses elasticity, resulting in wrinkles.
What physical losses and declines occur in late adulthood?
Late adulthood is considered to extend from the 60 on. This is the last stage of physical change. The skin continues to lose elasticity, reaction time slows further, and muscle strength diminishes. Smell, taste, hearing, and vision, so sharp in our twenties, decline significantly.
What physical changes happen in older adulthood?
With age, bones tend to shrink in size and density, weakening them and making them more susceptible to fracture. You might even become a bit shorter. Muscles generally lose strength, endurance and flexibility — factors that can affect your coordination, stability and balance.
Learn more about changes in body at adulthood :
brainly.com/question/11367958
#SPJ4
As I need to let you answer this, I am going to provide answers on both sides.
Democratic Party:
A member of the Democratic party generally believes in a strong Central government that provides a robust social safety net for the people. In the modern age, Democrats are more hesitant to use military might overseas and would rather spend the money investing at home. Democrats are broadly in favor of a woman's control over her own body and support gay marriage and the legalization of marijuana. Support welcoming immigration policies.
Republicans:
A member of the Republican party in the modern era believes in a weaker central government with more power to the states. They broadly believe in the power of the market to provide and are interested in the private sector helping citizens to succeed. They believe in a strong military and in using it. Republicans are split along religious lines as to abortion and gay marriage but are united in their opposition of weaker immigration policies.
C) freedom is the answer!
In general terms, most human beings are committed to obeying the law. However, to give a well-founded answer it's important to take into consideration the concepts of <em>ethics </em>and <em>morality</em> and also the cultures involved in this matter. Having said that, in the dilemma of a person being forced to choose between breaking the law to help a friend or not breaking the law but disappointing a friend, the results I would expect are the following:
The Hindu population (adults and children), based on the complex and inherent concept of <em>Dharma, </em>which assigns a high value to right conduct, ethics and morality, would tend to prioritise the obedience to law while the group of Americans would probably hesitate in this forced decision. Some psychology specialists talk about a moral crisis in America in which the limits of moral conviction, virtues and vices, good and evil, right and wrong are not very clear. If this applies to a vast part of American society, they would not be expected to choose law obedience in first place.
The answer is either Slums or Llaneros, for sure
