1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lilit [14]
3 years ago
13

Sometimes, science and religion come into conflict. this is because: science and religion must disagree. science and religion ca

n coexist just fine with a little effort, but sometimes choose not to do so.
Social Studies
2 answers:
SVETLANKA909090 [29]3 years ago
4 0

The bible contains facts that agree with science. Note this scripture found at Isaiah 40: 22 "There is One who dwells above the circle of the earth" It was only in the fifth century B.C.E that Greek scientists had taught the earth was a sphere. But before that many had thought it was flat. But this scripture in Isaiah was way before Greek's had made that discovery.

And even Aristotle's idea of decay, he had taught that only happens on earth and that the stars never change or die out. But the Bible had taught at Psalm 102:25,26 it speaks about the stars and how " Just as a garment, they will wear out. Just like clothing you will replace them, and they will pass away."


So while some scientists have disagreements  with religion, there are facts found in it that supports scientific findings. Science itself and religion can coexist and support one another based on true findings and good research.  The people who say they believe in one however has to believe in the other. Both only have facts if the other agrees with that one. Otherwise if they both disagree with each other, they're just opinions. Not true facts.  For people of religion to believe God is real, God made science. For people to believe in science, they believe in the thing he has made. You cannot disagree with the other.

NeTakaya3 years ago
3 0
I'm struggling with the wording of the second choice. My background is physics and most of the people I know are dumbfounded by the vastness of space, the laws that govern physics, and the beauty and simplicity of the way the universe explains itself. I have met people who do not agree with my assessment of the Universe, but they are in the minority and they are not fools for declining to agree. 

I am trying to say that Religion and Science can coexist and many people feel this coexistence to be true without question. People pray for example who also manipulate complex mathematical ideas. We don't choose conflict without reason, but coexistence is always possible. It only takes men and women of good will to make it work.

You might be interested in
The Montgomery bus boycott introduced a new generation of African American
andrey2020 [161]
I think its C, Leaders :)
7 0
3 years ago
When georges lemaitre first proposed the idea that the universe had a beginning, the majority of scientists opposed his idea bec
denpristay [2]

Here are some of the choices I gathered:

A) There was no data, observations, or theories to support Lemaitre's idea.

B) The accepted view was that the Universe was infinite and eternal.

C) Lemaitre was a Catholic Priest and his views weren't taken seriously.

The ANSWER is A. There was no data, observations, or theories to support Lemaitre's idea.

4 0
3 years ago
The Fundamentals of Ethics - Chapter 11: The Kantian Perspective - Fairness and Justice The Fundamentals of Ethics - Chapter 11:
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

Categorical Imperative; Immanuel Kant

Explanation:

Kant´s moral theory - influenced by the French Enlightenment Rationalism is based on the central idea that the only intrinsically good thing is a good will which is subject to the moral law.

The Categorical Imperative is his construction of moral law, following the principle of universalizability (applied to all people) and that of humanity - never treat other humans as a means to an and. It is therefore not surprising that Feminism used this part of Kantian Perspective on Ethics to condemn certain practices regarding women, because they treat women as means.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Isk of harm in social and behavioral sciences generally fall in three categories, which are:__________.
Dmitry [639]

Answer:

The correct answer for: Risk of harm in social and behavioral sciences generally fall in three categories, which are: Is: 1.- Invasion of privacy. 2.- Breach of confidentiality. 3.- Study procedure.

Explanation:

First of all risk of harm in social and behavioral sciences is a very general phenomenon that is part of the interdisciplinary objects o studies because it has many causes and many perspectives to be analyzed. It is such a complex phenomenon that can be analyzed by many postures and it has so many outcomes also that there has to be an event with the isolation of events or parts to be discussed, analyzed, and solved. Thus, invasion o privacy it's a very basic form in which this phenomenon can be caused or developed. Breach confidentiality also has a very close relation with le last mentioned because the exposure of information after it's gathering will lead to scenarios in which there could be a risk the subjects of study or the researchers can make the study all into this category. Now the last want is a bit complicated because even though it can define the procedure of study it also can be the same effect by revealing this information to the public.

4 0
3 years ago
Drag each phrase to the correct location on the chart.
ivanzaharov [21]

The matching of the phrase to their meaning base on judicial system are;

  • Judicial restraint: relies heavily on involves strict interpretation.
  • judicial activism: courts play active role
  • in shaping social policy.

<h3>What is judiciary system?</h3>

judiciary system serves as as as a system that deals with administration of justice in the Court of law.

Judicial activism is a philosophy which says judges can deviate from strict adherence of law while judicial restraint is the opposite.

When a court limits powers to strike down laws (judicial activism) means that there could be a little deviation from handling similar cases that has been handled before.

Learn more about judiciary system at;

brainly.com/question/4937540

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • ​eli is afraid of bees, and has been ever since he was nearly stung by one a few months ago. lately, his father has been very di
    8·1 answer
  • As part of her summer job, Martina was instructed to collect data from ten people to determine how they felt about a number of p
    15·1 answer
  • What brought increased public attention to the problems with the irb system?
    12·1 answer
  • In The world there are round 10 Million peoples without any citizenship.
    15·1 answer
  • If both the President and the Vice President can no longer serve, who becomes President?
    5·1 answer
  • GreyWing Products Inc., a large conglomerate, took over a small startup company that had made some breakthrough innovations in t
    6·1 answer
  • What approach is often used to understand what’s defined as deviant within a society?
    5·1 answer
  • The Roman Republic shifted decision making from the people to an elite Senate.
    7·1 answer
  • In 2009 Usain Bolt set the world record for the 100 meter sprint. He ran
    11·2 answers
  • Explain how sociological theories and concepts affect your work, home, and/or community life and influence your future learning
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!