1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lilit [14]
3 years ago
13

Sometimes, science and religion come into conflict. this is because: science and religion must disagree. science and religion ca

n coexist just fine with a little effort, but sometimes choose not to do so.
Social Studies
2 answers:
SVETLANKA909090 [29]3 years ago
4 0

The bible contains facts that agree with science. Note this scripture found at Isaiah 40: 22 "There is One who dwells above the circle of the earth" It was only in the fifth century B.C.E that Greek scientists had taught the earth was a sphere. But before that many had thought it was flat. But this scripture in Isaiah was way before Greek's had made that discovery.

And even Aristotle's idea of decay, he had taught that only happens on earth and that the stars never change or die out. But the Bible had taught at Psalm 102:25,26 it speaks about the stars and how " Just as a garment, they will wear out. Just like clothing you will replace them, and they will pass away."


So while some scientists have disagreements  with religion, there are facts found in it that supports scientific findings. Science itself and religion can coexist and support one another based on true findings and good research.  The people who say they believe in one however has to believe in the other. Both only have facts if the other agrees with that one. Otherwise if they both disagree with each other, they're just opinions. Not true facts.  For people of religion to believe God is real, God made science. For people to believe in science, they believe in the thing he has made. You cannot disagree with the other.

NeTakaya3 years ago
3 0
I'm struggling with the wording of the second choice. My background is physics and most of the people I know are dumbfounded by the vastness of space, the laws that govern physics, and the beauty and simplicity of the way the universe explains itself. I have met people who do not agree with my assessment of the Universe, but they are in the minority and they are not fools for declining to agree. 

I am trying to say that Religion and Science can coexist and many people feel this coexistence to be true without question. People pray for example who also manipulate complex mathematical ideas. We don't choose conflict without reason, but coexistence is always possible. It only takes men and women of good will to make it work.

You might be interested in
Question 8
natima [27]

Explanation:

plz mark as brainlist/////

5 0
2 years ago
Which statement below accurately matches the characteristics of an ethnic group? (44 a. 2) A. Esther reads the Quran daily, whil
neonofarm [45]

Answer:

Dhdhdhd

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What are examples of volatile liquid anaesthetics?
velikii [3]

Examples of volatile liquid anaesthetic include isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane and halothane

<h3>What are volatile liquid anaesthetics?</h3>

These are liquids or fluids that  make use of vaporizers to administer inhalation in patients.

The major  anaesthetics used in practise is the nitrous oxide. Other examples of volatile liquid anaesthetic include isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane and halothane

Learn more on volatile liquid anaesthetics here: brainly.com/question/5637444

#SPJ12

7 0
2 years ago
HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WILL GIVE 25 POINTS!!!!!
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Sanctuary Cities are abhorrent at best, and the reason is simple. One could back these ideas purely on principal, but instead the state and local governments that enact these sanctuary laws are doing so with only political motivation in mind. Much like every mass shooting, or every time something bad happens in our nation. The political dilemma we face is that these acts or carried out without pure intentions.

Pandering to a base by way of violating laws sets a terrible precedent going forward. it suggests that here our laws are different and "that line in the sand can move". what is a nation of laws which doesn't enforce them. The answer is a nation without a spine. A law is a law, and while one might disagree with the laws, and that is why we have a proper way of enacting changes we want to see done in our great nation.

This has been done with Marijuana in multiple states already, however cities and local governments do not hold a vote to allow residents to have a say. No, instead they declare the city as being a sanctuary, and depend on mob rule to force those who oppose into silence or to force them out of the city entirely.

If we want to make it easier for people to attain visas and green cards, let's have that discussion and vote on it. if we want to make the US open borders, let's have a discussion and vote on it. but to simply say "to hell with you" and violate the law of the land without the say so from the citizens of state and local municipalities is mob rule at best and a violation of the oathes of offices taken by those we elect into those offices.

Personally, I believe that it is too hard for immigrants to attain visas and green cards, and that isn't to mention the financial cost ranging in the thousands for a single person going through this process. I believe this system requires change and needs revision, but it is wrong to declare sanctuary cities and states. one because it is done with motivation of pandering to a base for political gain, and lastly it sets a precedent for lawlessness in our greater country and local and state governments.

If we are to be a nation of laws, then we must be a nation of laws and not lawlessness. If we are to be a nation of suggestions, then we should carry on as we are currently doing. I love to do what feels right, but it must be done in the right way, otherwise you add fuel to the fires of division in our nation, and as Abraham Lincoln once famously stated; "A divided house cannot stand".

5 0
2 years ago
Asa is buying a gift for his mother, an overbearing woman who is difficult to please. when a clerk asks him who he is shopping f
ruslelena [56]
The answer is option "<span>c. freudian slip".

A Freudian slip refers to a blunder in discourse, memory, or physical activity that is translated as happening because of the impedance of an oblivious stifled wish or interior line of reasoning. The idea is a piece of traditional psychoanalysis.It alludes to something you think unwittingly, and after that say it, without acknowledging what it really implies.
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • "high unemployment leads to worry over economic growth""fed chairman: expect a rate decrease soon""sales of treasury bonds decre
    6·2 answers
  • How does the government deal with a budget deficit
    11·1 answer
  • Welma is unable to accept the fact that she has been diagnosed with lung cancer. She refuses treatment despite her family’s atte
    6·1 answer
  • We . . . solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; tha
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the following is a cause of the stock market crash of 1929?
    6·1 answer
  • The regulatory agency responsible for regulating and supervising medical devices and cosmetics is the
    8·2 answers
  • HELP NOW BRAINLIST AND 15 POINTS
    10·1 answer
  • Article One of the Constitution describes the powers of the
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following situations would most likely occur if the dollar's exchange value dropped in relation to the
    12·1 answer
  • Essay of dangers of teenage marriage 250 word​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!