I think its the second one
<span>They became more concerned with foreign policy.
hope this helps
</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is : C
a. appropriate, as the quick increase in the frequency of Allie's participation will likely significantly enhance the class's conversation.
b. appropriate, as twenty minutes is a brief time period so Allie won't struggle with the issue of delayed gratification.
c. inadvisable, as the expectation that Allie so quickly make so many comments may lead to anxiety and ultimately cause the plan to fail.
d. inadvisable, as by third grade, Allie should be able to demonstrate self-monitoring over a longer period of time.
Explanation:
In this case, Allie is making many comments so quickly and this situation can cause anxiety because of her shyness so the plan would not have the outcome expected and she may be in a very uncomfortable situation due to her personality. This action wouldn't be recommendable as a good strategy.
David Livingstone was a Scottish missionary, whilst Cecil Rhodes was an English businessman. Both somewhat helped kick start more colonization in Africa, with Livingstone creating a general curiosity of the Nile River, while Rhodes is quoted with starting the British Imperialism in South Africa. Rhodes is technically the founder of South Africa, while Livingstone was a missionary and explorer and was very interested in social justices, such as "rags to riches" and held an anti-slavery stance.
I believe the answer is: <span> Mexico
</span><span> centralized decision making tend to be more prevalent in a developing countries. For highly industrialized nations, each regions could operate independently without the guidance from the central government and would still produce healthy amount of GDP/</span><span />
