Answer:
-2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
If you do the slope intercept form (y=mx+b) you'll get -2/3
The y-intercept would be at (0,8)
Answer:
The answer is "9 and 7".
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
![A=\left[\begin{array}{cc}7&9\\0&9\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3D%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7D7%269%5C%5C0%269%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Using formula:
![\to |\left[\begin{array}{cc}7&9\\0&9\end{array}\right]-\lambda \left[\begin{array}{cc}1&0\\0&1\end{array}\right] |=0\\\\\\ \to |\left[\begin{array}{cc}7&9\\0&9\end{array}\right]- \left[\begin{array}{cc}\lambda&0\\0&\lambda\end{array}\right] |=0\\\\\\\to|\left[\begin{array}{cc}7-\lambda &9\\0&9-\lambda\end{array}\right]|=0\\\\\\\to|(7-\lambda)(9-\lambda)|=0\\\\\to (7-\lambda)(9-\lambda)=0\\\\\to 7-\lambda=0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 9-\lambda=0\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cto%20%7C%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7D7%269%5C%5C0%269%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D-%5Clambda%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7D1%260%5C%5C0%261%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%7C%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cto%20%7C%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7D7%269%5C%5C0%269%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D-%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7D%5Clambda%260%5C%5C0%26%5Clambda%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%7C%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cto%7C%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7D7-%5Clambda%20%269%5C%5C0%269-%5Clambda%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%7C%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cto%7C%287-%5Clambda%29%289-%5Clambda%29%7C%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cto%20%287-%5Clambda%29%289-%5Clambda%29%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cto%207-%5Clambda%3D0%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%209-%5Clambda%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C)
Answer:
The exact length of the third side would be 9.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the length of the triangle, just add the height (6) and the base (3) which equals 9.
The original expression evaluates to 54.4 as shown in the first working.
_____
For some reason, 3.4 got transcribed to be 1.7 in the 3rd line of the second working. There is no math operation in the expression that requires 3.4 to be divided by 2.
