1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timama [110]
4 years ago
5

You know that the assets of a firm BIG are today worth 100mil. You reasonably feel that in a year they will be either worth 110m

il or 90mil. You also know that a riskless zero coupon bond maturing in one year is offering today a yield of 5%. The firm has issued a zero-coupon bond that matures in one year and has a face value of 100mil. 1. What should be the value of this corporate bond today? 2. What should be its yield to maturity? 3. What should be the value of the equity of the firm? 4. Can you do a further analysis of this problem?
Business
1 answer:
Ainat [17]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

(1) 95.23 (2)5.008% or 5% (3) The value of equity is zero (4)The future value of the firm will be 110 mil. than Firm equity will be 110-100 =10 mil not zero

Explanation:

Solution

Given that:

The worth in good in this example= 110 mil

Worth in bad in this example =90 mil

The future value =( 110+90)/2

=100

Future value = 100

Now

(1) The Present value = F/(1+r)^n

=100/1.05

=95.23

(2) the yield to maturity is given below:

YTM = (FV/PV)^n -1

Here

FV = future value

PV = present value

n=years

Thus

(100/95.23)^1 -1

=5.008% or 5%

Since the bond are zero coupon bond so interest rate is equal to YTM

(3) The total worth =100 mil

Thus

The Debt +equity =100

100+equity =100

Equity =100-100

=0

Hence the value of equity is zero.

The firm BIG is only debt firm. Firm do not have equity.

(4) The future value of the firm will be 110 mil. than Firm equity will be 110-100

=10 mil not zero

You might be interested in
American Inc. had gross sales of $925,000. Cost of goods sold and selling expenses were $490,00 and $220, 000 respectively Ameri
drek231 [11]

Answer:

a. Particulars                                Amount

Gross sales                                  $925,000

Less: COGS                                 <u>$490,000</u>

EBITDA                                        $435,000

Less: Depreciation                      <u>$120,000</u>

EBIT                                              $315,000

Less: Interest on notes payable <u>$8,800   </u>  (220000*4%)

EBT                                               $306,200

Less: Tax (35%*306200)             <u>$107,170</u>

Net Income                                   <u>$199,030</u>

<u />

b. Operating cash flow = Net income + Depreciation

Operating cash flow = $199,030 + $120,000

Operating cash flow = $319,030

6 0
3 years ago
*LOOK AT THE PHOTO PLEASE*<br> By law, people who file for bankruptcy
myrzilka [38]
A must get credit counseling before they file
8 0
3 years ago
A simultaneous rise in productivity and nominal wages would shift the short-run aggregate supply curve to the: right if the cost
worty [1.4K]

Answer:

left if the rise in nominal wages is larger than the rise in productivity

Explanation:

Aggregate supply curve shows all goods and services that is supplied to consumers during a particular period in a particular country.

Movement along aggregate demand curve is as a result of price, however a shift in the curve results from othe factors such as income, taxes, cost of input, and so on.

Increased wages will lead to reduction in aggregate supply because the cost of input (labour) has increased. So supplies will be able to produce less at the higher cost.

A rise in productivity will result in increase in output per unit time. So more will be produced.

If the rise in wages is higher than those in productivity it will result in a shift to the left. That is products will be supplied at less quantity than before. This is as a result of more cost on the supplier.

8 0
3 years ago
Barb and Ken purchased a house for $300,000 in 2005. When they needed to sell because of a job transfer in 2009, the house was a
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

On the basis of their actions in selling their house at $300,000 despite being use for years , their behavioral tendencies at work include loss aversion and anchoring.

Loss aversion is a psychology and decision taking theory where people try as much as possible to avoid making losses but make equivalent gain.

Anchoring is defined as a cognitive bias where the human being rely on an existing information as reference for decision making.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the beginning, a low base salary for the owner, with a bonus at the break-even point is?
frez [133]

Answer:

The best solution

Explanation:

I took the test and got it right

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Price falls from $6.50 to $6.00. Quantity demanded increases from 100 to 200.
    13·1 answer
  • The sum of $180 was divided among 3 people so that the second person received $6 less than twice as much as the first, and the t
    14·1 answer
  • Match each term with its best description A. goods and services are worth what people believe they are worth and are willing to
    14·1 answer
  • ____ is any technology that aids in gathering information about a person or organization without their knowledge
    14·1 answer
  • The main reason for the high cost of american political campaigns is the cost of
    6·1 answer
  • A corporation reports the following year-end balance sheet data. The company's equity ratio equals: Cash $ 58,000 Current liabil
    5·1 answer
  • What makes a business successful?​
    6·1 answer
  • Ohno Company specializes in manufacturing a unique model of bicycle helmet. The model is well accepted by consumers, and the com
    6·1 answer
  • IAS 32 defines a financial instrument as: any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liabil
    15·1 answer
  • BUSINESS
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!