1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stels [109]
3 years ago
15

Barb and Ken purchased a house for $300,000 in 2005. When they needed to sell because of a job transfer in 2009, the house was a

ppraised for $250,000 but they put it on the market for $300,000 anyway. The house is still on the market. Behavioral tendencies at work here may include:
A. representativeness and narrow framing.B. loss aversion and anchoring.C. familiarity bias and self attribution bias.D. overconfidence and representativeness.
Business
2 answers:
Korvikt [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The answer is B. loss aversion and anchoring

Explanation:

Loss aversion is a theory that refers to the tendency of people to prefer avoiding losses in order to acquire equivalent gains. For instance, when someone prefers gaining $100 over losing $100. The reason behind this is because the pain of losing is twice as much as the pleasure of gaining.

Anchoring is the phenomenon of using an event or something as a point of reference when a comparison is being done.

From the scenario given above, we see that Barb and Ken are averse to losing $50,000 on the house they bought for $300,000. The point of reference for this comparison will be the $300,000 they paid for the house initially.

Salsk061 [2.6K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

On the basis of their actions in selling their house at $300,000 despite being use for years , their behavioral tendencies at work include loss aversion and anchoring.

Loss aversion is a psychology and decision taking theory where people try as much as possible to avoid making losses but make equivalent gain.

Anchoring is defined as a cognitive bias where the human being rely on an existing information as reference for decision making.

You might be interested in
The trial balance for Lindor Corporation, a manufacturing company, for the year ended December 31, 2016, included the following
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

Net income $302,000

Comprehensive Income $382,000

Earnings Per Share 0.30

Explanation:

Preparation of a single, continuous multiple-step statement of comprehensive income for 2016, including appropriate EPS disclosures.

Lindor Corporation Statement of Comprehensive Income for 2016

Sales revenue $2,300,000

Less Cost of goods sold $1,400,000

Gross profit 900,000

($2,300,000-$1,400,000)

Less Operating expenses:

Selling and administrative expenses ($420,000)

Operating income $480,000

($900,00-$420,000)

Less other expenses:

Interest expense ($40,000)

Income before tax Expenses $440,000

($480,000-$40,000)

Income tax Expenses $132,000

(30%*$440,000)

Net income $302,000

($440,000-$132,000)

Other comprehensive income:

Add Unrealized holding gain on investment securities,net of tax $80,000

Comprehensive Income $382,000

($302,000+$80,000)

Earnings Per Share:

Net Income

(302,000 / 1,000,000) 0.30

Therefore Lindor Corporation single, continuous multiple-step statement of comprehensive income for 2016, including appropriate EPS

disclosures will be :

Net income $302,000

Comprehensive Income $382,000

Earnings Per Share 0.30

3 0
3 years ago
a company gives its employees monetary bonuses at the end of the company's fiscal year based on their contributions to the firm'
shutvik [7]

Depending on how well they performed financially, employees of a media organization receive financial incentives at the conclusion of the fiscal year. This is a strategy for tying pay to performance metrics.

<h3>What connection exists between compensation and performance evaluations?</h3>

Performance reviews are helpful in evaluating employee compensation packages. Depending on how well an individual performs, their compensation package may include bonuses, increased hourly rates, additional benefits, and allowances.

<h3>Should pay be contingent on performance?</h3>

One of the best ways to encourage your workers to produce their best work and the behavior you want to see in them is to link performance to reward. Sales-based occupations in particular are frequently compensated using performance-based strategies.

<h3>What benefits do performance-based compensation programs offer?</h3>

When pay for performance is in place, poor performers may leave the company more frequently, but over time turnover dramatically decreases as pay rises and employee engagement rises. After the approach has been fully adopted, we usually notice a 50% decrease in turnover or more.

Learn more about performance-based compensation: brainly.com/question/14287686

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
The following are budgeted data: January February March Sales in units 16,900 23,800 19,900 Production in units 19,900 20,900 20
horrorfan [7]

Answer:

Purchases= 20,675 pounds

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Production:

Feb= 20,900

Mar= 20,000

One pound of material is required for each finished unit.

Desired ending inventory= 25% of the following month's production needs.

<u>To calculate the purchase required for February, we need to use the following formula:</u>

Purchases= production + desired ending inventory - beginning inventory

Purchases= 20,900 + (20,000*0.25) - (20,900*0.25)

Purchases= 20,675

7 0
3 years ago
When Job 117 was completed, direct materials totaled $5,090; direct labor, $5,838; and factory overhead, $4,042. A total of 1,49
allsm [11]

Answer:

the per unit cost is $10

Explanation:

The computation of the per unit cost is shown below:

As we know that

Per unit cost is

= Total cost ÷ number of units produced

= ($5,090 + $5,838 + $4,042) ÷ (1,497 units)

= ($14,970) ÷ (1,497 units)

= $10

hence, the per unit cost is $10

We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come

And, the same is to be considered  

3 0
3 years ago
Suppose you win the lottery and have two options: A. Take $1 million now. B. Take $1.2 million to be paid out as 300,000 now and
laila [671]

Answer:

A. Take $1 million now.

Explanation:

A. If we take $1 million now the present value of the money is $1 million.

B. If we choose to take $1.2 million paid out over 3 years then present value will at 10% will be;

$300,000 + $300,000 / 1.2 + $300,000/ 1.44 + $300,000 / 1.728

$300,000 + $250,000 + $208,000+ $173,611 = $931,944

The present value of option B is less than present value of option A. We should select option A and take $1 million now.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which career worker installs, maintains, and repairs equipment used for communication? Select all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • Comparison of product features is part of the ____ phase of the decision-making process
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a barter system?
    11·2 answers
  • The study of how changes in the input parameters of a linear programming problem affect the optimal solution is known as
    7·1 answer
  • Name the written test a potential driver must pass and list the minimum required score to earn a learner’s license.
    11·1 answer
  • Sheffield's Bakery makes a variety of home-style cookies for upscale restaurants in the Atlanta metropolitan area. The company's
    13·1 answer
  • You run a coffee shop where demand is constant week to week. You use 10 bags of roasted coffee each week. Currently, you order w
    6·1 answer
  • What is the risk you are taking when investing in bonds? How can you minimize this risk?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an appropriate way to prepare for a meeting?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the difference between an absorption spectrum and a standard curve?.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!