I’m sorry that’s to much to read I can’t help you with this one
Answer:
1. Pro-Maintain tight oversight of technologies and manufacturing methods, build American employment that improve domestic reputation, and theoretically gain tax cuts.
2. Pro-Less start-up charges wanting to work to current manufacturers, possibly avoiding import-related taxes / punishments, and potentially taking advantage of brand recognition as well as financial acumen.
1. Con-Possibly increasing labour charges, logistics and delivery costs, customs duties or punishments on entry into the western europe territory , market stimulation expenses.
2. Con-Less power over production cycle and efficiency, knowledge sharing, less efficient workers.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": green marketing.
Explanation:
Green marketing refers to the efforts companies make to conduct their operations with the least harm to the environment possible or exploiting resources that are considered beneficial for individuals' health. Those resources are typically obtained from suppliers that also work towards providing certain benefits to the society they work in.
The answer to the question is that the substitution of domestic steel for foreign steel absorbs resources that would otherwise produce goods of great value.
Though America is declining in terms of domestic steel production, it does not mean the nation as a whole is failing, including in terms of production. Since the skills that workers use to produce steel are transferable to other industries, this allows them to be involved in industries that are creating more relevant value right now than steel; choosing to return to domestic steel production might prove to be inefficient.