1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erica [24]
3 years ago
9

What is the main difference between the limited and omniscient third-person narrative point of view?

English
2 answers:
olya-2409 [2.1K]3 years ago
6 0

The main difference between the limited and omniscent third- person narrative point of view is the scope and the characteristics of the point of view.  If the writer just sets the focus on one character- the third person- , the reader learns about that character's feelings and thoughts. Therefore, the point of view is limited to only that character. This limited point of view is subjective.  On the other hand, if the writer sets the focus on all the characters and their actions, the reader learns about the whole story. This story is told by an invisible , god-like narrator. The point of view is unlimited and objective.

ASHA 777 [7]3 years ago
3 0

A third-person limited point of view is when the narrator knows as much as the reader does. A third-person omniscient point of view is when the narrator knows the feelings/emotions of the character.

You might be interested in
The most dangerous game word cycle
marta [7]

“The Most Dangerous Game” offers a clever play on words, with game carrying two different meanings: (1) human beings as Zaroff's hunted and (2) the competition, or game, between the hunter (Zaroff) and the hunted (Rainsford and other castoffs).

hope i helped :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is any media channel involved to save the tigers ?​
agasfer [191]

Answer:

Explanation:

Tigerslife.com

7 0
3 years ago
What does the character Dr.Faustus suggest about the idea of the Renaissance Man???
sattari [20]

So, Dr. Faustus is an embodiment of curiosity gone wild. His blase attitude towards humanistic science is, however, some kind of a scientific decadence: he casts away philosophy and law, to embrace magic, as a relic of medieval obsession over mysticism. In this regard, he is a subversion of the Renaissance Man. He thinks he has already learned all there was to learn about this world, so now he yearns for another kind of knowledge - esoteric, otherworldly, knowledge that isn't exactly a knowledge because you don't have to study long and hard for it, you just have to sell your soul to Lucifer.




6 0
4 years ago
22. ________ of the accident, the police rushed to the scene immediately.
garri49 [273]
Probably B. Having been informed
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
She said to me , Give me some apples ,'​
Lisa [10]

Answer:

and here there are apple

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • read from what to the slave is the Fourth of July? By Frederick Douglass How do Douglass use antithesis to advance his purpose
    8·1 answer
  • Is a declarative sentence a fact
    6·1 answer
  • Which two sentences in this excerpt from south! Show that Shackleton felt his men displayed determination in difficult situation
    12·2 answers
  • Read the outline.
    12·1 answer
  • Reinforcement and punishment are defined in terms of _____.
    6·1 answer
  • __________ is the branch of literature comprising works of narrative prose dealing with or offering opinions or conjectures upon
    13·2 answers
  • What part of the central nervous system controls sleep and appetite?
    11·1 answer
  • Help! really fast pls
    11·2 answers
  • Rodrigo Santoro studied acting in college ? True or false
    7·1 answer
  • Of the enumerated methods of note-taking, what is your MOST favorite and why?​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!