Answer:
Primary reasons a company would decide to expand internationally are as follows:
- Expanding markets and increasing sales are one of the primary reasons.
- Companies get globalized in order to become a market leader.
- The company may choose to enter into international market in order to diversify a company's product line.
- Markets and investments would be protected by companies once they enter into international market and get engaged in an international business.
- Controlling the expenses is again one of the most important reasons. Company would buy the resources to gain cost advantage.
- For example, the company which is located in Canada gets most of their resources from China; the company would look forward to get situated near China.
- Another reason would be, to get protected from their competitors or to gain advantage over them; the company would decide to expand internationally.
The three motivational factors that induce a company to go global are as follows:
- Economies of Scale — The advantage that a company gain through mass production to achieve the lowest possible production cost per unit.
- Economies of scope — The advantage that a firm gains by producing different varieties of products and services and at different regions.
- Low-Cost Production Factors — It is an opportunity to purchase the resources at the lower possible cost.
Jaguar Land Rover decided to manufacture cars outside the UK for the first time. In recent years, it has rapidly expanded in its home UK and the company is planning to go to Brazil and implement the strategies that they had implemented in India.
Jaguar Land Rover moves to other countries to gain the opportunity of producing at a lower price and to gain economies of scale.
Answer: (-2,0), (0,0) or A and B on E2020
Explanation: The line chart shows the X-intercepts as (-2,0) and (0,0).
Also: Just took quiz and got 100%
Question Completion with options:
a. Past performance information provided directly by the offeror should not be relied upon.
b. The past performance evaluation satisfies the responsibility determination required under FAR subpart 9.1.
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
d. Offerors with demonstrated past performance that is neither relevant nor recent must not be removed from further consideration for award.
Answer:
The statement that is true regarding the evaluation of the past performance is:
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
Explanation:
It has been established that past performance is the best indicator of future performance. Past performance can predict future performance, behavior, and success. Organizations that achieve some good performance in the past build the required confidence, which will help them to forge ahead in the present and future. This is why in selecting companies for a negotiated competitive services acquisition, even the past performance of predecessor companies should be reviewed to get a better handle on the company's ability to deliver on the projects.
Answer:
ur image is not loading ...... I'm sorry for not able to ans
