Answer:
1. The narrator is a young European man who was hated by the Burmese people. His job as a Policeman worsened the hatred of him.
2. He was upset, sad, and angry at the treatment he received from the Burmese people.
Explanation:
In Shooting an Elephant, I could deduce that the narrator is a young European man who disliked his job and was hated by the Burmese people. The discrimination could be seen in his everyday life. When he went to play football, he was treated harshly by his playmates and referee.
On the streets, people sought to trap him and beat him up. The narrator was oppressed and the main reason could be attributed to his being a European. He secretly sided with the Burmese people and was against their British
Explanation:
I would say the best answer is B. A subtopic within the main topic
Hope this helps :-)
Answer:
To my mind, the biggest problem with the play is that we are not given an sufficient explanation for Hamlet’s miserable treatment of Ophelia. honestly if i was a man i would want some respect. but if i was ophelia i would want to be treated like a lady.
I'm assuming the underlined conjunctions are <em>both </em>and <em>and </em>(because you didn't underline any, and those are the only two conjunctions in the sentence).
Those conjunctions are called correlative conjunctions - this means that they are connecting two items which are equally important. So, this woman saw both Billie Holiday and Ella Fitzgerald - and both of those artists are important to the woman.
No man is not inherently "evil" but we we did evolve from primates and all have the capacity to act in ways that damage ourselves and others.
