Answer:
World powers contributed more troops to United Nations peacekeeping forces
Explanation:
According to both Source 1 and Source 2, it is described that the UN peacekeeping has come under increased scrutiny based on how they acted or failed to act in peacekeeping missions.
In Source 2, Rwandan professor Joseph Nsengimana spoke on how the UN soldiers allowed the local militia to maim and murder over 3 million people in the Rwandan genocide and how they let the Rwandan people down.
The events described in Source 2 influenced world powers’ stance on foreign intervention in the late 1990s and early 2000s by making them contribute more troops to United Nations peacekeeping forces.
Answer:
A.Americans were anxious about the future of the country because of the stalemate in the war.
Explanation: HOPE THIS HELPS!
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
The answer accurately describes religious practices of ancient kush or was a civilization centered in the North African region of Nubia, located in what is today northern Sudan.
Answer:
<h2>Marbury v. Madison</h2>
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison (1803), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws, statutes, and some government actions that they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.
