Answer:
The firm must save $45,172.02 monthly for 24 months to be able to pay $1,130,000 at 4.3% compounded monthly as found in the attached
Explanation:
In calculating the monthly saving , I used the PMT function in excel,whose formula is given as PMT(rate,nper,pv,-fv)
r represents the rate on the savings given as 4.3% annually but 0.36% per month (4.3%/12 months), as the compounding is done monthly.
nper represents the duration of savings,given as two years but multiplied by 12 months to reflect monthly compounding horizon
pv is the present value zero as it is not given and not required
Fv is future value given as $1,130,000
Find detailed computation in the attached.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "<span>c.Frictional, seasonal, and structural unemployment " </span>most likely still occur when the economy has achieved full employment is that <span>c.Frictional, seasonal, and structural unemployment </span>
Answer:
Walking to the convenience
store to buy a snack.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": opportunity cost of the equity capital invested by the owners.
Explanation:
In Accounting, explicit costs are those incurred as a result of the operation of the companies. <em>Raw materials, direct labor, overhead </em>or <em>rent </em>are examples of explicit costs. Implicit costs represent the opportunity costs of the firm over forgone decisions or decisions not taken at all like avoiding hiring more employees.
The economic profit of a firm includes both explicit and implicit costs. <em>The accounting profit of a company includes only the explicit costs, thus, the opportunity costs of the equity capital of investors are not taken into consideration.</em>
Answer:
Singapore way of governance is undisputed by their citizens based on the question. The statement shows that their is a definite harsh and strict way of rule in Singapore. Here is why,
Explanation: Whenever a state can administer a form of punishment to its people on otherwise non life threatening matters, it clearly shows that:
1. The state itself has a style of leadership that is somewhat harsh and autocratic.
2.Their is a definite sense of grip by the leaders to control and dictate what suits their desire.
3.These could also translate as an effective method of governance if the people are fairly okay with the implementations and rules in place. For Singapore all the above seem to fall in place concerning the above question. Therefore it is safe to say all three points apply in the above question concerning Singapore.
