All categories

3 years ago

What keys to success did the leaders describe

1 answer:

4 0

<h2>Answer: <u>As well as providing direction, inspiration, and guidance, good leaders exhibit courage, passion, confidence, commitment, and ambition. They nurture the strengths and talents of their people and build teams committed to achieving common goals. The most effective leaders have the following traits in common.</u></h2><h2><u /></h2>

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Suppose fairness is defined as those with the highest incomes can afford to pay a greater proportion of their income in taxes. T

Sati [7]

Answer:

c. A progressive tax on income.

Explanation:

Suppose fairness is defined as those with the highest incomes can afford to pay a greater proportion of their income in taxes. Then the following taxation systems would be consistent with this notion of fairness is a progressive tax on income.

A progressive tax is a taxing system in which the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases.

"Progressive" as a terminology refers to the way the tax rate progresses from low to high, as income level increases.

8 0

3 years ago

A firm has estimated the following demand function for its product:

Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

(i) Q=300

(ii) Elasticity of Demand=-3.33 (elastic)

(iii) Income Elasticity= 2.5 (normal good)

(iv) Advertising Elasticity: 1.5

Explanation:

The Demand function is given by

$Q=100-5P+5I+15A$

(1) To solve (i) we need to replace P = 200, I = 150, and A = 30 in the demand equation:

$Q=100-5(200)+5(150)+15(30)=300$

(2) To find the price elasticity (how much quantity demanded changes with price) we use the point price elasticity formula

$\eta_{Price}=\frac{\Delta Q}{\Delta P}\frac{P}{Q}$

From the above equation we get: $\frac{\Delta Q}{\Delta P}=-5$

Replacing in the elasticity formula

$\eta_{Price}=-5\frac{200}{300}=|-3.33|>1$

in absolute terms the elasticity is bigger than one so it is an elastic demand.

(3) For income elasticity (how much quantity demanded changes with income), we proceed similarly as above. But the derivative is respect to income

$\eta_{Income}=\frac{\Delta Q}{\Delta I}\frac{I}{Q}=5\frac{150}{300}=2.5>1$ [/tex]

Which is bigger than one, denoting this is a normal good because it's bigger than one.

(4) Advertising elasticity (how much quantity demanded changes with expenditures in advertising), we proceed as before

$\eta_{advertising}=\frac{\Delta Q}{\Delta A}\frac{A}{Q}=15\frac{30}{300}=1.5$

3 0

3 years ago

A delivery company spent $3,500 last week upgrading one of its trucks. This week the company is trying to decide if this upgrade

Scilla [17]

<u>Answer:</u> Sunk cost

<u>Explanation:</u>

Sunk cost means the expense which has been already met by the firm and they cannot be recovered at any rate. Sunk costs are not based on the future decisions as these expenses for the firm are the same irrelevant to the project which it is assigned. Sunk costs are not a part of the budget plan.

In the given scenario the delivery company has spent $3500 in order to upgrade the truck. So $3500 is treated as sunk cost in the proposed project.

4 0

3 years ago

Bubba's Custom Shrimp Catering uses activity-based costing to determine the cost of its catering events. The firm has two activi

Svetach [21]

Answer:

The best option would be option d since it provides the least cost and therefor a higher possibility of being the most profitable.

a. Total cost for option a=$37,000

b. Total cost for option b=$36,250

c. Total cost for option c=$33,750

d. Total cost for option d=$30,625

Explanation:

<em>Step 1: Determine the formula total cost</em>

Total cost=direct costs+cooking cost+serving cost+improvement costs

<em>Consider option a</em>

where;

direct costs=$400×25=$10,000

cooking costs=cooking cost per catering event×number of catering events

cooking costs per year=500×25=$12,500

serving cost=serving cost per plate×number of events×number of plates per event

serving cost per plate=$12

number of events=25

number of plates per event=(80/100)×50=40

serving cost=12×25×40=$12,000

Improvement costs=$2,500

replacing;

Total cost=10,000+12,500+12,000+2,500=$37,000

<em>Consider option b</em>

where;

direct costs=$10,000

cooking costs=cooking cost per catering event×number of catering events

cooking costs per year=500×25=$12,500

serving cost=serving cost per plate×number of events×number of plates per event

serving cost per plate=$12×0.75=$9

number of events=25

number of plates per event=50

serving cost=9×25×50=$11,250

Improvement costs=$2,500

replacing;

Total cost=10,000+12,500+11,250+2,500=$36,250

<em>Consider option c</em>

where;

direct costs=$10,000×0.75=$7,500

cooking costs=cooking cost per catering event×number of catering events

cooking costs per year=500×25=$12,500

serving cost=serving cost per plate×number of events×number of plates per event

serving cost per plate=$12×0.75=$9

number of events=25

number of plates per event=50

serving cost=9×25×50=$11,250

Improvement costs=$2,500

replacing;

Total cost=7,500+12,500+11,250+2,500=$33,750

<em>Consider option d</em>

where;

direct costs=$10,000×0.75=$7,500

cooking costs=cooking cost per catering event×number of catering events

cooking costs per year=500×25×0.75=$9,375

serving cost=serving cost per plate×number of events×number of plates per event

serving cost per plate=$12×0.75=$9

number of events=25

number of plates per event=50

serving cost=9×25×50=$11,250

Improvement costs=$2,500

replacing;

Total cost=7,500+9,375+11,250+2,500=$30,625

7 0

3 years ago

Should a congress bill contain “whereas” clauses ?

slava [35]

Ion really get your question

8 0

3 years ago