You have not given us any of the steps that Ricardo took to simplify the
expression, and you also haven't given us the list of choices that includes
the description of his mistake, so you're batting O for two so far.
Other than those minor details, the question is intriguing, and it certainly
draws me in.
If Ricardo made a mistake in simplifying that expression, I'm going to say that
it was most likely in the process of removing the parentheses in the middle.
Now you understand that this is all guess-work, because of all the stuff that you
left out when you copied the question, but I think he probably forgot that the 3x
operates on everything inside the parentheses.
He probably wrote that 3x (x-3) is
either 3x² - 3
or x - 9x .
In reality, when properly simplified,
3x (x - 3) = 3x² - 9x .
It will be the model that has the arrow going to the right with the starting point at 60 having a solid circle.
Answer:
The Customer Acquisition Cost for each customer in demographic group 1
The correct option is c
The Customer Acquisition Cost for Group 2
The correct option is b
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The marketing expenses per month for targeting the first group is 
The marketing expenses per month for targeting the second group is 
The number of customers for the demography of group 1 that will be attracted is N = 1000
The number of customers for the demography of group 2 that will be attracted is M = 1500
Generally the customer acquisition cost for group 1 is

=> 
=> 
Generally the customer acquisition cost for group 2 is

=> 
=>
The answer is 40 cause 4 times 9 = 36 so juat add the 0 to 4 and it makes it 40 times 9 ='360
Answer: No
Step-by-step explanation:
An arithmetic sequence is one where the same number is being added to the number before it. For example, 2, 4, 6, 8..., where 2 is being added to each number.
In this case, however, the number being added is not consistent with this pattern. Between 5 and 9, the difference is 4 and between 9 and 14, the difference is 5, and so forth. This pattern does not follow the rules of an arithemtic sequence.