Answer:
(q2 - q1)
Explanation:
I have uploaded the picture the question refers to below.
We can see that under a price ceiling of $0, the quantity of kidneys supplied is Q1, and if the price ceiling is removed, and the market is allowed to reach equilibrium, the new quantity of kidneys supplied is Q2, so the increase in the supply of transplanted kidneys can be found by the formula (q2 - q1)
Answer:
Misstatement of age
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within this question it can be said that the term that describes what is happening in this situation would be Misstatement of Age. Like mentioned in the question this is a provision in many life insurance policies which adjusts the individuals premium to the actual price based on their age if there was an error with the individuals age in the policy. Which is exactly what has happened to Lisa Smith.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
No, it is not ethical.
The risks that Emerald faces by not upholding his responsibility for the collection and payment of employment taxes is that, first of all, this is not correct. He has an obligation, a moral and a fiscal obligation to report on time the employment taxes. That is why his actions are not ethical although he indeed does pay before he gets caught. That decision could be a business decision to buy some time and trying t fix other problems, but a true leader does not need to cover things with wrongdoings. What can of example is he showing to his employees?
Later on, on another occasion, he won't have the moral authority to demand ethical behavior from his employees. He is not setting an example.
Answer:
$1,500
Explanation:
Given the compounding formula 
And given an investment (P), made at 16% compounded annually (r), and an ending amount of $1,740 (A) at the end of the year (n = 1 year), the original amount invested (P) can be computed as follows.
= P = 1,740/1.16 = 1,500.
Therefore, the original investment was $1,500.
Firms that can employ and establish <u>isolating mechanisms</u> are more likely to protect their competitive advantage from being copied and/or eroding away.
Isolation mechanisms:
A company is able to maintain its competitive edge for a longer period of time if it can stop a rival from copying the resource or capability that provides it that advantage. Isolation mechanisms is the name of this technique. For instance, a patent is a legitimate tool to stop imitation.
A firm's objective is to have a prolonged competitive advantage when a resource or capability gives the firm an advantage over competitors for an extended period of time. The industry will determine how long a company can preserve a competitive advantage.
If a business can maintain a competitive edge for a year in a fast-moving field like information technology or quick fashion, it may be quite happy. In an industry with less frequent changes, such as feminine hygiene, a persistent competitive advantage may remain considerably longer.
A sustainable competitive edge cannot be maintained by any company indefinitely. The competition is constantly working to improve its own competitive edge.
Learn more about Isolation mechanisms here:
brainly.com/question/15095207
#SPJ4
