Answer:
The fish appears nearer to the cat than it really is
Explanation:
The situation above is related to the refraction of light. The cat will think that the fish is closer to him, however, it is actually at a<u> different depth</u> in its<em> actual position</em>. This is because of the refraction of light as it travels in two different mediums: <em>water and air.</em> The eyes and brains are<u> not capable of tracing the light rays' refraction,</u> thus, the cat's image of the fish is on a shallower depth. In reality, the light rays reflecting from the fish are actually being refracted on the water's surface.
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
The null hypothesis is the problem statement and alternative hypothesis is counter of the null hypothesis.
Hence, the null hypothesis here is the rate of extinction was neither higher nor lower when there were sudden climatic changes (asteroid strike)
And alternate hypothesis is "the rate of extinction was either higher or lower when there were sudden climatic changes (asteroid strike)"
Hence, option C is correct
Yes. Gymnosperms is less dense.
