1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
3 years ago
8

Help please!! i’m very confused i’m on my last assignment of summer school... “a work of literature must provide more factual ac

curacy or vivid physical reality... it must tell us more than we already know” -E.M Forster
i’m supposed to write an essay if i agree or disagree with that statement but i need a thesis statement to get me started... or if you can explain what i’m even supposed to do thank you

English
1 answer:
Setler [38]3 years ago
6 0
The statement basically states “Books should show us the real world and not a fantasy where we are thought to believe things. It must guide us in our time on Earth.” You are supposed to provide your opinion on what you think.

I would write something like this:

Literature has been around for centuries, maybe even millenniums. It has brought people out of the depths of despair and helped them over come problems in day-to- day life. There are all kinds of books out there - fantasy, adventure, romance, but should all those books be forgotten and thrown out for man only to read non-fictional books that are factual rather than interesting?

On one hand, books should be used as a tool for living. They should be informative and contain facts that could benefit us through out our lifetime. An interesting quote is, ‘Knowledge is the key to life’ therefore reading non-fiction books will help us in the future and reflect our actions when we grow up.

On the other hand, books have been brought to life to transport a person away from his troubles into a fictional world, where they are happy and blissful. Taking away such books and reading only factual information will not benefit a humans mind, for they will grow old and grumpy; they will obtain a lot of information but they will be dissatisfied with life - so what is the point of that? Moreover, books are books. No matter the genre or the origination of the book, it will teach us grammar and vocabulary which is vital for a human to know; it will make us emotionally happy and we will still gain knowledge from it.

In my opinion, Forster is wrong because a work of literature MUST provide a scope for the imagination and it must alter reality a little but for us to imagine - for without imagination, we are nothing.


I hope this helps, and please tell me what grade you got as I would love to know:))
You might be interested in
Ella is working on a report analyzing the relationship between parental and teen smoking. She found this graph during her resear
Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

Adult smoking rates had been dropping for more than 30 years before teenagers began reducing their rates.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I NEED THIS ASAP PLEASE HELP ITS FOR AN EXAM
qwelly [4]

Answer:

It's not clear send a clearer image

6 0
3 years ago
select the correct spelling for the word that completes the sentence. the science teacher is showing us how to instantly _____ i
Eduardwww [97]
That would be ....
liquefy
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What effect did the French Revolution have on the evolution of the French cuisine?
skelet666 [1.2K]

Answer:

D. Chefs were able to open their own restaurants and make fine dining accessible to the public.

Explanation:

The aftermath of the French Revolution saw a change in the prominent cuisine then. Since the royalty was overthrown, a lot of royal chefs were no longer required and this development saw the surge of chefs in the public domain. These chefs opened their own restaurants and were innovative with their culinary skills.

They no longer cooked traditional meals or followed to the latter, the strict  Escoffier's guidelines on cooking. That became the talk of the town, as people often talked about different chefs and their innovative styles of cooking. They were opposed by the Escoffier chefs who were not happy with the recent development.

4 0
3 years ago
In "The Grasshopper and the Bell Cricket," the grasshopper symbolizes A. the common and mediocre. B. beauty and delicacy. C. lan
KIM [24]
In the Grasshopper and the Bell Cricket," by Yasunari Kawabata the grasshopper symbolizes A. the common and mediocre.
The narrator views bell crickets as more unique than grasshoppers and thought that Fuijo should simply live his childhood to the fullest instead of filling it with disappointment.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Identify the prepositional phrase in the following sentence: Because I was running late, I quickly ran to my car and didn’t have
    8·2 answers
  • Prudence indeed will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordi
    14·2 answers
  • What is one of journalist Carroll Kilpatrick's purposes for writing the article "Nixon Resigns"? to explain how the White House
    10·1 answer
  • One good question to ask yourself the editing process?" ________"
    9·1 answer
  • Verb Tenses A: You said last week that you were going to move. How is it going? B: We’re really tired. Yesterday, we (pack) ____
    8·1 answer
  • How do you typically respond to criticism? How could you improve this response using information provided in the unit? Explain
    15·2 answers
  • TEST 2
    13·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE
    13·1 answer
  • Plz answer i need good gradehalp....................
    10·1 answer
  • In at least 150 words, Identify an example of dramatic Irony from Romeo and Juliet and explain why It is ironic.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!