Answer:
Explanation:
X1 X2 Z
0 0 0
16 0 4,000
0 10 3,500
8 6 4,100
check the picture attached for more explanation
The United States government was correct in interfering with the growth of Standard Oil. Not only was the company taking advantage of existing situations, but eventually it would have controlled the oil market entirely. If Standard Oil was able to gain control of the market for a long period of time, consumers could have had to pay extremely high prices for the oil that they needed, limiting their purchase of other goods. Or Sample response: The United States government should not have interfered with the growth of Standard Oil. Because the company had managed to reduce production costs, it was able to offer very low prices to consumers. This benefited many Americans. Without the company's production benefits, citizens were not able to take advantage of this infrastructure.
The answer is D.
Copy is usually used to indicate the letter have been send to someone else
Answer:
Interest expense for the year: 33,590.33
Explanation:
face value $ 300,000
rate 9%
time 15 years
issued at $ 201, 136
discount: $ 98, 864
amortization per year under straight-line: the discount is equally distributed for each period
98,864 / 15 = 6,590.33
<u><em>interest expense per year:</em></u>
face value x rate + amortization:
300,000 x 0.09 + 6,590.33 = <em>33,590.33</em>
The statement above about gap analysis is: True.
<h3>What is Gap Analysis?</h3>
Gap Analysis is a measurement that an entrepreneur makes when he compares his present performance with that which he desires to achieve.
He evaluates the time money and resources spent on projects to know if they are fully optimized.
So, the statement above is right.
Learn more about gap analysis here:
brainly.com/question/10549036