Answer:
C). Shannon's physician gives her some pain medication and tells her not to drive after she takes it, as the medication induces drowsiness. In spite of the doctor's warning, Shannon decides to drive to the store while on the medication. Owing to her lack of alertness, she fails to stop at a traffic light and crashes into another vehicle, causing a passenger in that vehicle to be injured.
Explanation:
Negligence is defined as the 'tort whereby a duty of reasonable or standard care as defined by law is breached, causing damage or any conduct short of .'
In the above situation, Shanon was aware of the after-effects of the medication she took as her physician instructs her to not drive because she may feel drowsy. Despite this warning, her decision to drive to the store reflects her negligence i.e. 'intentional action that falls below the legal standard for preventing unreasonable damage or harm.' Thus, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
TRUE
<u>Explanation:</u>
The correct answer is true as the independent projects are selected based on the net present worth and the rate of return and do nothing alternative. In the independent projects, there is no need for the incremental B/C analysis. Simple B/C ratio will do it. If the B/C > 1, benefits outweigh the costs and the project is selected provided that there is no budget limitation. Thus, the given statement is absolutely the true one.
Answer: This certain manager should be able to reach out to other the employes to join more organizations. I think that if these other employees are contributing to more organization than others, Then they will be more selected. The other employees that are not contributing will certainly be fired. Thanks this is my way of reasoning:)
Answer:
ok I'll give you what I know monopolies are one business operating so try and use that
