1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
eimsori [14]
3 years ago
7

A similarity between the federal and state court systems is that both have trial, appellate, and civil courts. trial, appellate,

and high courts. family, appellate, and high courts. traffic, appellate, and civil courts.
Social Studies
2 answers:
Vikki [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B. trial, appellate, and high courts.

Explanation:

Edge 2020

olga nikolaevna [1]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B. Trial, appellate, and high courts.

Explanation:

The federal court is court system that is usually in charge of lawsuit between either two states in a country, a country and citizens, a country and other countries etc. While the state court system have an authority to decide on cases between citizens in a state, a state and its citizens, etc.

Both courts operate on the same set of laws that has been established in cognizance of with the country's constitution. Therefore the verdict by either system is based on justification and purity. A major similarity between the two systems is trial, appellate, and high courts.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is a disadvantage of using crowdsourcing?​
e-lub [12.9K]
1. No confidentiality. This is the deadliest downfall of crowdsourcing. ... Putting your naming challenge out for crowdsourcing can clue in competitors to what you're up to and make it possible for someone else to see your great new idea and run away with it.
5 0
3 years ago
Amendment IX of the US Constitution states: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to d
krek1111 [17]

The purpose of the IX Amendment was to claim the precept that the enumerated rights aren't exhaustive and very last and that the listing of certain rights does now no longer deny or disparage the life of different rights.

<h3>What do you know about Amendment IX?</h3>

No Title of Nobility will be granted with the aid of using the United States: And no Person preserving any Office of Profit or Trust below them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, take delivery of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any type whatever, from any King, Prince, or overseas State.

The rights included with the aid of using the Ninth Amendment aren't specified, they're mentioned as “unenumerated".

Therefore, The purpose of the IX Amendment was to claim the precept that the enumerated rights aren't exhaustive and very last and that the listing of certain rights does now no longer deny or disparage the life of different rights.

Learn more about IX Amendment here:

brainly.com/question/796033

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
What happened to tribes when the Europeans made these new borders?
bixtya [17]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

It seems that ypur question is incomplete because it doesn't include any context, reference, map, or something we can use to help you answer the question.

What tribes are you referring to? What is the time in history?

However, trying to help you, we can comment on the following.

We assume that you are referring to the European presence in Africa after the Berlin Conference of 1855. If that is the case, then we can say that what happened to tribes when the Europeans made these new borders was that they eliminate some borders, modified others, create new regions, moved tribes from their former territories, and displaced people.

This was a moment in history known as the Scramble for Africa," that started in 1885 and ended approximately in 1914.

The European countries involved in the partition of Africa were France, Great Britain, Portugal, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Belgium. In reality, these countries were only interested in colonizing Africa to exploit the many raw materials and natural resources of the continent.

4 0
3 years ago
Inefficiencies of slavery
Rama09 [41]

This is the best I got:  The best way to prove that slavery was in fact an inefficient market because the assumptions of Fogel and Engerman are weakly based and in some cases rather short-sighted.

4 0
3 years ago
In which of the following cases did the Court establish the standard of objective reasonableness under which an officers use of
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) case

Explanation:

It was a US Supreme Court case, in which the Court found that the civil claim that police officers use unreasonable force in the arrest, detention or any other "confiscation" of an individual will relate to an objective standard of reasonableness.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A savings account is an example of a
    7·2 answers
  • As you think you, you travel, as you love, you attract. you are today where your thoughts have brought you
    14·1 answer
  • Read this line from "Song of the Open Road."
    15·2 answers
  • The Five-Year Plan
    12·1 answer
  • What impact has economic development has on the environment?
    9·1 answer
  • about how many months did it take Sarah Raymond in her family to get from Missouri to Virginia City in the Montana territory in
    12·2 answers
  • Please help <br> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
    6·2 answers
  • A researcher is studying the effect of caffeinated drinks on the activity level of ten-year-old children. Half of the children i
    11·2 answers
  • Rural–Urban Migration in Brazil
    8·1 answer
  • The ________ is the informal designation for the heads of the major federal government departments.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!