Answer: C
Explanation: If you look at the second sentence beggining only C makes sense. I also did the test of Edgeinuity. I hope it helps!
Answer:
Belgium, the Netherlands, Czech republic, Austria, Switzerland, Germany-(is the largest one in between)
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
If the following internal summary were used in an informative speech, the speech would most likely be organized in____________ order.
On our tour of campus thus far, we have moved from the student union on the east side of campus and around the perimeter. We’ve taken in the engineering campus on the north, the design college on the west side, and the school of education on the south.
a. causal
b. formal
c. analytical
d. spatial
e. topical
Answer:
The correct answer is letter d. spatial.
Explanation:
A speech that is organized in spatial order has its ideas arranged according to geography or location. Such order is useful when analyzing and examining conditions and structures. It can be used, for instance, to describe the disposition of a room, or how a mechanism works, or even the structure of a house or building. Spatial order is often combined with other types, such as the chronological order, when explaining phenomena, – migration, for instance -, that involve aspects related to location as well as time. The internal summary given as an example focuses on listing places, and their geographical positions, that have been toured.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
there are people surrounding the natives with a cross. the natives seem to be on the ground. there are also people pointing things toward the natives. this does not seem like the natives are choosing nor does it seem like the christians are protecting them.
This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that we cannot provide here. However, we can still develop some ideas that might help you in your work.
The House of Representatives can be considered both the people's branch and the insiders' branch. However, there is no question that the institution is now a lot more restrictive and less connected to the people than it was when the Framers designed it. Therefore, I would argue that it has become an insiders' branch.
First, legislators do not listen to constituents all the time. This is because each legislators has an enormous amount of constituents, all of which have very different characteristics. Moreover, legislators need to reconcile the interests of their constituents with those of other groups.
Second, the policymaking process makes it difficult for the public to monitor and evaluate the House. This is because common people do not have access to the necessary information to make this possible. Moreover, the process is long and complicated, and cannot be easily understood by all people.
Finally, partisan gerrymandering and polarization means that certain groups of constituents are much more important to a politician's career and support than others. This includes constituents in swing states, or constituents who support a particular party. Therefore, these constituents might see their interests represented more often than others.
