Answer:In short, the British treated their colonies in vastly different ways, both across different regions and within the same colonies over time.
The British Empire was never a consistent empire. Across various colonies, there were different raisons d’être and methods of organization for each one. Even within America, different Colonies were founded for entirely different reasons. Virginia started out as a mercantile colony run by a company; Massachusetts was originally a Puritan theocracy; New York was a crown colony taken over from the Dutch; and Maryland and Pennsylvania were religiously tolerant colonies governed by (relatively) benign hereditary feudal rulers (called proprietors), the Barons Calvert and the Penn family. South Carolina, with its rice and indigo plantations, was more akin to a Caribbean colony than its continental neighbors.* At the same time that the American Colonies were emerging, the East India Company established outposts in India, and the Royal African Company did much the same in Africa. None of them were uniformly governed or similar in character; the British government occasionally took notice but generally was not involved in their governance.
Explanation: hi ;0
Answer: The answer is B.
Explanation: It because the court decided that even though the first amendment protects the freedom of speech, if the speech creates a danger to the United States then it can be restricted.
The south wanted to keep the slavery, while the north didn't.... P.S buffalo soldiers fought in the civil war and the spanish american war, buffalo soldiers were the first African american group to fight in a war
I wrote an essay on this. I am 98% sure it's Bushido.
