1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Veronika [31]
3 years ago
7

Seventy percent of light aircraft that disappear while in flight in a certain country are subsequently discovered. Of the aircra

ft that are discovered, 60% have an emergency locator, whereas 90% of the aircraft not discovered do not have an emergency locator. Suppose that a light aircraft has disappeared.a) If it has an emergency locator, what is the probability that it will not be discovered?b) If it does not have an emergency locator, what is the probability that it will be discovered?c) If we consider 10 light aircraft that disappeared in flight with an emergency recorder, what is the probability that 7 of them are discovered?
Mathematics
1 answer:
alukav5142 [94]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Figure out the various probabilities first, that will make the rest of the questions easier:

P(discovered) = .7

P(not discovered) = 1 - .7 = .3

P(locator|discovered) = .6

P(no locator|discovered) = 1 - .6 = .4

P(locator|not discovered) = 1 - .9 = .1

P(no locator|not discovered) = .9

P(discovered and locator) = .7 * .6 = .42

P(discovered and no locator) = .7 * .4 = .28

P(not discovered and locator) = .3 * .1 = .03

P(not discovered and no locator) = .3 * .9 = .27

a) The total probability that an aircraft has a locator is .42 + .03 = .45. So the probability it will not be discovered, given it has a locator, is .03/.45 = .067

b) The total probability that an aircraft does not have a locator is .28 + .27 = .55. So the probability it will be discovered, given it does not have a locator, is .28/.55 = .509

c) Probability that 7 are discovered = C(10,7) * P(discovered|locator)^7 * P(not discovered|locator)^3

We already figured out P(not discovered|locator) = .067, so P(discovered|locator) = 1-.067 = .933. C(10,7) = 10*9*8, so we can compute total probability: 10*9*8 * .933^7 * .067^3 = .133

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Greatest common factor of 112 and 63
FrozenT [24]

Answer:

It's 7!

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Sansa wrote this expression:
NISA [10]

Answer:

34 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help with one question. <br> anyone pls?
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

(-3,4)

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 2y = 5

-3 + (2*4) = 5

-3 + 8 = 5

5 = 5

2x + 3y = 6

(2*-3) + (3*4)=6

-6 + 12 = 6

6 = 6

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(I need someone to answer fast please and a clear answer too so ill mark them as brainlyest) :)
AVprozaik [17]

Answer: 12.6 m

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the pythagorean theorem, we get that the height, or x, is

sqrt(22x22-18x18) = sqrt(484-324) = sqrt(160) = 4sqrt(10) = 12.6 m

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.
horrorfan [7]
A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}
where:
N(t) is the population after t years
N_{0} is the initial population 
t is the time in years 
r is the growth rate in decimal form 
e is the Euler's constant 
We now for our investigation that N(t)=238300, N_{0} =192157, and t=10; lets replace those values in our equation to find r:
238300=192157e^{10r}
e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}
ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )
r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}
r=0.022
Now lets multiply r by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
(0.022)(100)=2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that N(t)=713777, N_{0} =951307, and t=10. Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find r:
713777=951307e^{10r}
e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}
ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )
r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}
r=-0.029
(-0.029)(100)= -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}.
Final equation from point B: N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations N(t)=192157e^{0.022t} and N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t} and solve for t:
192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}
\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1
e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}
ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})
t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}
t=31.36
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be 2(951307)=1902614. Now we can rewrite our equation as: N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}. The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}
\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1
e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}
ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )
t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}
t=44.95
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit. 

  
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Simplify the following ​
    5·1 answer
  • Please help for brainliest!! <br> 45 POINTS !!
    8·2 answers
  • On a multiple choice test of 86 questions, a student get 8 questions wrong. To the nearest percent, what percent of the question
    7·1 answer
  • Round to the nearest whole number 61.35634
    7·1 answer
  • Can some one help me with this how many kilograms is this ???<br><br> Really need help
    6·2 answers
  • I NEED HELP PLEASE !!!! CORRECT ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST
    15·1 answer
  • Add the doubles . Then use the doubles to help you solve the doubles plus facts. 3+3
    12·2 answers
  • At a pet store, Rhonda paid $55 for 8 dog bowls and 6 bones. Kelly paid $32.50 for 2 dog bowls and 9 bones. Determine the cost o
    7·1 answer
  • What is the fastest why to learn multiplication??
    6·2 answers
  • Please and Thank you!
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!