Answer:
Yes is True that when a firm initiates or increases a cash discount, the net effect on the accounts receivable investment is difficult to determine because the nondiscount takers paying earlier will reduce the accounts receivable investment, while the new customer accounts will increase this investment.
Explanation:
Accounts Receivable is any amount of money owed by customers for purchases made on credit. It is an asset account on the balance sheet since it is money due in the short run.
As a current asset, Accounts Receivable is an important aspect of a businesses' fundamental analysis used to measures a company's liquidity or ability to cover short-term obligations without additional cash flows. 
Accounts receivable Investment will be reduced if the firm initiates or increases a cash discount.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Australia has purchasing-power parity with the U.S.
Explanation:
A basket of goods costs $800 in the US. The same basket costs 1,000 euros in France and 960 Australian dollars in Australia.  
The nominal exchange rate for euros is .80 euros per U.S. dollar and for Australian dollars, it is 1.2 Australian dollars per U.S. dollar.  
The purchasing power parity theory compares the currency of two countries through a basket of goods. The currency of the two countries is in equilibrium or is at par if a basket of goods cost the same in both the countries.  
This method compares the economic productivity and standard of living in two countries.  
Converting the value of basket in France into US dollars,
=  
= $1,250  
Converting the value of basket in Australia into US dollars,
=  
= $800
The cost of the basket of goods is same in Australia. This indicates that Australia has purchasing-power parity with the U.S.
 
        
             
        
        
        
It depends on the person I would definitely be happy but that’s just me
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
D.$3,950
Explanation:
Production = ($10,285 + $9,800 + $8,800) ÷ 5,450units
=$28,885÷5,450 units
 = $5.3per unit
COGS = 3,300 units sold × $5.3 per unit
 = $17,490
Net income = Revenue − Cost of goods sold − Selling and administrative expenses
Net income = (3,300 units × $7.80 per unit) − (3,300 units sold × $5.3per unit) − $4,300
=(25,740-17,490)-$4,300
= 8,250-$4300
=$3,950
Therefore Silverman's net income for the first year in operation is $3,950
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Option A, B and D are correct, It will reduce the profit of the company who is loosing the monopoly, and fewer drugs will be invented in the market and firms are loosing the monopoly, and the sunk cost will increase.