Answer:
B) should pack her bags for the trip; she earned it
Explanation:
In this scenario, it can be said that if the client purchases that annuity, the agent should pack her bags for the trip; she earned it. Since the annuity that has been recommended by the agent is offering her an incentive, and the agent fully disclosed that fact to the client, then she did her duty correctly. In the case that the client decides to purchase the annuity, they do so with full knowledge of the potential conflict of interest.
Incontestability clause - This tells us the insurance company may not contest the validity of the policy during the insured's lifetime for any reason, including fraud, if the policy has been in effect for a predetermined duration
What is incontestability clause?
An incontestability clause in a life insurance policy safeguards the policyholder and forbids the insurer from changing any aspect of the insurance coverage as a result of a misinterpretation or false statements made by the insured (the policyholder) after a certain amount of time. A life insurance policy's provider cannot revoke any statement after a specified period of time thanks to an incontestability provision. This provision is frequently regarded as offering policyholders the most robust defense.
Learn more about insurance here:
brainly.com/question/16267577
#SPJ4
Answer:Therefore, total surplus is maximized when the price equals the market equilibrium price. In competitive markets, only the most efficient producers will be able to produce a product for less than the market price. Hence, only those sellers will produce a product
Explanation: i no it
Answer:
Explanation:
Coupon rate = 5.07%
Yield to maturity = 4.84%
Rate = Yield/2 = 2.42%
N = 14 = 14*2 semiannually = 28 semiannually
Face value = $1000
PMT = (face value*coupon rate)/2 = $25.35
Need to find price which is PV
Using the financial calculator, PV = $1023
Number of bonds to be issued = 41,000,000/1023 = 40,078
Answer:
Option c. is correct
Explanation:
Under the Golsen rule, the Tax Court must follows the Court of Appeals such that the court of appeals has direct jurisdiction over the taxpayer. The Court is said to reach a decision without calculating the tax when a Tax Court decision is said to be entered under Rule 155.
In this question, The Golsen rule applies here and weakens the legal justification for the deduction
