We cannot cut any pieces from the 1/4yard string as it is smaller than the 3/5 yard pieces we want to cut.
<u>SOLUTION:
</u>
It is given to us that a worker cut pieces of string that are each 3/5 yard in length.
We have been asked to find out how many pieces of string can the worker cut from a piece of string that is 1/4 yard in length.
The total length of the string available for cutting is
yard.
We shall convert
into decimal form for the simplicity of the calculation. Which gives us:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad046/ad0464f9912d46ea3165b39ba273bd3883a88cf1" alt="= \frac{1}{4}"
= 0.25 yard
Now the small pieces that want to be cut of 0.25 yard are given as
yards. So, now we convert
yard into decimal as well for uniformity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf1f7/cf1f771771cc68adfcee70a13a7f94360b18355a" alt="= \frac{3}{5}"
= 0.6 yard
So from the calculations we can see that 0.25 yard is smaller than 0.6 yard.
Therefore, we cannot cut any pieces from the
yard string as it is smaller than the pieces we want to cut.
Nper = 11*2 = 22 (indicates the period over which interest payments are made)
PMT = 1000*10.3%*1/2 = 51.5 (indicates sem-annual interest payments)
PV = 1000*95% = 950 (indicates the current selling price of the bonds)
FV = 1000 (indicates the face value of bonds)
Rate = ? (Indicates YTM)
YTM = Rate(Nper,PMT,PV,FV)*2 = Rate(22,51.5,-950,1000)*2 = 11.098% or 11.10%
Answer is 11.098% or 11.10%.
Answer:
The supposition is incorrect.
Step-by-step explanation:
The growth rate of a child is not constant, so height versus time does not look like a straight line. Nothing is wrong with the prediction made using the false assumption. You can conclude anything you like when you start with a false premise.
Yes. And thanks.for free branana