Answer:
The right answer is, D. Synergy
Explanation:
Because synergy is the action of working in a team for two or more causes that generate a much greater effect on the results, than if it were worked individually.
Answer:
2. A large group with very diffuse possible benefits
Explanation:
the free-rider problem mostly applies to public goods that is goods or resources shared by a group of people. This problem is created when a burden arises from individuals sharing and using public resources who do not pay for them or sometimes underpays for it's usage . This problem could arise from small or large groups but would be most severe with large groups as these resources face heavier usage with large groups
Answer: The Access and Legitimacy Paradigm.
Explanation:
The implementation of diversity within the business so as to be able to compete in diverse markets is referred to as the Access and Legitimacy Paradigm.
The business may sometimes face a market that is difficult to crack which may call them to employ or hire diverse employees who may help them break into this market. The legitimacy refers to how easy it may be to interact with individuals that look like you.
It may assist companies break into various demographic groups. If the business deal with people of different race or Ethnic groups on a daily basis having diverse employees may be very beneficial to the company because these employees can bring local knowledge which will assist the business to cater directly to the specific needs of that society where the business is located. Also it will make customers feel comfortable to speak to someone who looks like them and speak their langauge, because they may feel understood hence the business gains more customers due to diverse employees.
Calmpt Inc is that kind of company because we are told that they its customers and employees belong to different ethnic groups.
Answer:
because .......................
Explanation:
they wanted to take the risk
This is an opinion question, so here is what I would answer with:
The government should not place special taxes on fast food as it is how some people survive. People with low income cannot simply run to the grocery store and get everything to make a burger and fries. They must rely on large fast food chains to give them healthy, enough, food for survival.
OR...
The government should place special taxes on fast food. This would increase the prices on foods sold. This said pricing could detour the public to making healthier, cheaper food choices.
