Answer:
with a very strict system: Hammurabis code
Explanation:
Hammurabi, king of the Babylonian Empire, created a set of laws to every city-state to better govern his bourgeoning empire. HAMMURABIS CODE (eye for an eye)
Known today as the Code of Hammurabi, the 282 laws are one of the earliest and more complete written legal codes from ancient times.
Hope this helped :)
Answer:
<h3>Yes, society as Kurt Vonnegut imagines in his "Harrison Bergeron" could be read as symbolic of realities in our society today.</h3>
Explanation:
Vonnegut's story presents a future where the U.S Constitution has created a complete uniform society where every citizen is treated equally in every aspects of life. However, to achieve this feat, the government has abolished the principles of individuality and personal liberty.The government subdues any form of individual talent or intellectual abilities.
Vonnegut does not seem to distinguish any particular government here, but we can relate a similar case given the time when he has written this story. The story was published in 1961 which was during the time of Cold War. Perhaps through this story, he wanted to criticize the socialist or Marxian form of government emphasized by USSR.
The story revolves a government that tries to subdue any form of individualistic ideas or innovations. It contrast the tenets of capitalism and democracy where individual freedom and talented intellectuals are oppressed by the government.
Similarly, the control of media and oppression of freedom of speech and expression by governments are some symbolic realities in our society today. This is because the government tries to suppress any form of dissent or criticism against them. Individuals who opposes the government are usually forced into silence by imprisonment and other forms of threats.
Answer:
it takes a safe rocket with technology to get it there and a brave enough team of astronauts.
The correct answer is C) gave federal courts more power over state election processes.
The Supreme Court's Bush v. Gore's ruling was important because it gave federal courts more power over state election processes.
After the results of the Electoral College gave the victory of the election to Republican candidate George W. Bush, the Democratic country demanded to have a recount on the votes and the Supre Court of the state of Florida authorized a recount of votes. However, the US Supreme Court decision in the case Bush v. Gore ordered to end the recount of the votes in Florida. So the victory of George W. Bush in Florida gave him the victory in the presidential election of 2000.
I think the answer is the second one
