Answer:
no -9/4 is irrational
Step-by-step explanation:
vacsusvvsjshsvsh plz give brainliest
Answer:
Yes.
Step-by-step explanation:
0.66 is 0.6600.
<h3>Answer:</h3>
Yes, ΔPʹQʹRʹ is a reflection of ΔPQR over the x-axis
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
The problem statement tells you the transformation is ...
... (x, y) → (x, -y)
Consider the two points (0, 1) and (0, -1). These points are chosen for your consideration because their y-coordinates have opposite signs—just like the points of the transformation above. They are equidistant from the x-axis, one above, and one below. Each is a <em>reflection</em> of the other across the x-axis.
Along with translation and rotation, <em>reflection</em> is a transformation that <em>does not change any distance or angle measures</em>. (That is why these transformations are all called "rigid" transformations: the size and shape of the transformed object do not change.)
An object that has the same length and angle measures before and after transformation <em>is congruent</em> to its transformed self.
So, ... ∆P'Q'R' is a reflection of ∆PQR over the x-axis, and is congruent to ∆PQR.
graph of g is the the graph of f shifted 3 units above
i dont know if the translator translate that coreclty
Answer:
Charles need 
more ounces of seeds.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Quantity of seeds Charles has = 
= 
ounces
Quantity of seeds Charles need = 
ounces
Let,
x be the number of remaining seeds Charles need.
x = Seeds needed - Seeds Charles already have
x = 
x = 
x = 
x = 
x = ounces
Hence,
Charles need more ounces of seeds.
