1. What did each side get in the Compromise of 1850?

1 answer:

6 0

My Answer:
1.) The South gained stronger fugitive slave law and the North gained California-free state.
2.) A major impact of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was that it brought the US closer to a civil war.
3.) Any person aiding a runaway slave by providing shelter, food or any other form of assistance was liable to six months' imprisonment and a $500 fine an expensive penalty in those days.

Hope I helped! :D

You might be interested in

Who was the primary negotiator of the compromise of 1850

vlabodo [156]

Henry clay was the negioator

3 0

3 years ago

in the text the author discusses some of the ways the first amendment has been interpreted. in the context of our current americ

NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

This question is really geared more towards your own interpretation, so there isn't necessarily going to be a right or wrong answer. I would say that today the first amendment protects when people are speaking out against policies and general injustices in the American society today, and for instance, on social media I have seen people say "f trump and f america." The first amendment is protecting them, so that nobody can hold that statement against them and press charges. If we lived in russia, the russian secret police would find you, and kill you for that. Personally, I believe that if someone wanted to burn an american flag on their front lawn, and curse america, they should not be protected by the first amendment. that should be a crime. However, the first amendment does protect them, so there is nothing anyone could do about that legally.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

According to Thomas Hobbes’s concept of the social contract , what do people exchange for protection by the government?

Fynjy0 [20]

Answer: Hobbes believed people exchange their personal liberty for protection and security under a government.

Explanation/detail:

Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called Leviathan in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.

Probably the most famous set of lines from Hobbes' Leviathan book describes what he saw as the natural state of human affairs without government -- one in which every individual had freedom, but that meant it was a situation of "war of all against all," or we might say, every man for himself. Hobbes wrote:

In such condition, there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was not true of the aftermath of world war i?

balandron [24]

I thinks that the answers its D

7 0

3 years ago

What is significant about the Mayflower Compact?

pychu [463]

Hey mate...

Ur answer is..

It was the first form of self-government in the colonies.

6 0

3 years ago