Answer:
Now we can calculate the p value based on the alternative hypothesis with this probability:
The p value is very low compared to the significance level of
then we can reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of people liberal is higher than 0.24
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=200 represent the random sample taken
X=75 represent the number of people Liberal
estimated proportion of people liberal
is the value that we want to test
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to verify if the true proportion of adults liberal is higher than 0.24:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing the info given we got:
Now we can calculate the p value based on the alternative hypothesis with this probability:
The p value is very low compared to the significance level of
then we can reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of people liberal is higher than 0.24
Answer:
94.7%
Step-by-step explanation:
If it is only winning or losing cards, then you can subtract 5.3 from 100 because probability is out of 100%
100-5.3 = 94.7
The perimeter of inside of the track is 536.44m
<h3>Perimeter of a circle and rectangle</h3>
The perimeter of a circle is also known as the circumference of the circle. The formula for calculating the circumference is expressed as:
C = 2πr
where
r is the radius
From the given diagram
r = 46/2 = 23m
C = 2(3.14)(23)
C = 144.44m
Find the perimeter of the rectangle
P = 2(l+w)
p = 2(46+150)
P = 2(196)
P =392m
The perimeter of the inside track = 144.44 + 392
The perimeter of the inside track = 536.44m
Hence the perimeter of inside of the track is 536.44m
Learn more on perimeter of composite shape here: brainly.com/question/16247505
#SPJ1
Answer:
is this good?? i mean is it correct