andes i think. if not sorry
Answer:
The three primary stakeholders are the banks, the merchants, and the consumers.
Banks = Against, since this would mean that they will be receiving less
Merchants = For, since they would be paying less
Consumers = Generally unaffected. But I believe they would be more against the proposal because if interchange fees are capped, then the banks will find other ways to retrieve the lost revenues by other means, such as increasing the interest or etc.
Answer:
Is there a D all of the above
Explanation:
If not than I think the answer is A
Answer:
Social Assumptions
Explanation:
A woman who shows herself at the bar is sometimes perceived differently than a man that does the same thing. The interpretation of what it means as a man and a woman to perform the same behaviour in society is overwhelmingly different. Unfortunately, gender bias and gender roles separate male and female allowances.
So, a woman and a man doing the same thing at a bar is perceived differently.
The perception of a man and woman dressed similarly is viewed differently
These are not examples of exhibitionism but the individuals are dressed the way they want and feel comfortable.
Gender bias exists because this behaviour has been introduced and been allowed to perpetuate in society for generations upon generations.
This is continued because society allows it to continue by perpetuating this "norm".
Since women are held at a different standard than men, a man's sexual promiscuity is not viewed the same as a woman's sexual freedom.
Women are most likely to be stigmatized in these cases, unfortunately and in time this may change.
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
