Answer:
I think he’s able to explain complex political topics (i.e., guns, income inequality) in simple, narrative ways that the public can easily understand. He also has a strong political point of view which makes his documentaries inherently more entertaining. Just my two cents...
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Irini plucked plump berries as thorns cut her pink stained fingers.
Explanation:
While the other sentences portray decent detail, they mostly just cut to the point of the story, without giving you any real visualization. Sentence C uses the most use of adjectives, which can really help you to use your senses, and see what going on, even as you aren't really there.
The options are:
a). Nebergall is an armchair Mars enthusiast with a career as a business analyst.
b). Nebergall argues convincingly that Mars is the last, best hope for the survival of humanity.
c). I think that Nebergall is a brilliant scientist who needs to be recognized.
d). Nebergall avoids using pathos in his essay.
Answer:
b). Nebergall argues convincingly that Mars is the last, best hope for the survival of humanity.
Explanation:
The introduction of any literary work primarily aims to clarify the topic to the readers, state its importance, thesis, grab readers' interest and attention, and highlight the key focus that the author will throw light upon.
In the given essay, <u>the second option most adequately enhances the introduction as it clearly states the key argument of the author that how credibly 'Mars is the last yet most effective alternate for human survival</u>.' This would not only inform the readers about the author's viewpoint but also capture their interest. The description of the use of the data establishes the logical validity of the claim and supports the author's claim. Thus, <u>option b</u> is the correct answer.
He believed reason to be a more trustworthy guide than religious doctrine.
-He believed churches that imposed taxes on their constituents to be directly opposed to their religions.
