Answer:
A. the world in spatial terms
Explanation:
The world in spatial terms refers to the geographical locations and points of various places. It gives informations about territorial boundaries etc.
This is why A geographer who studies the locations of things that are happening in cities most often uses the essential elements of geography known as the world in spatial terms.
Answer:
i dont know mabybe for gold or something or slaves
Explanation:
thanks for ponits
The resolution of the Supreme Court Case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette was a landmark decision reached by the court, which stated that the right of freedom of speech provided by the First Amendment legimated students to refuse to salute the US flag or to spout the The Pledge of Allegiance of the flag if they attended a public school. It is therefore not mandatory, and more important, not considered a criminal offence to refuse to perform publicly patriotic demonstration acts.
The court victory was achieved by the Jehovah's Witnesses who, due to the prescriptions of their religion, could not salute or pledge to symbols. The Supreme Court ruling decided that the state should not have the power to oblige citizens to express themselves in a certain manner. Therefore, it is a clear defense to the right of speech, and it proves how the legal and judicial instruments guarantee it for citizens.
Answer: TRUE
<span>"Externality" is the term which is used to describe an unintended side effect that affects a third party that had no involvement in the activity that caused the side effect. The side effect is called a positive externality if it benefits the third party, while it is called a negative externality if it is harmful to the third party.</span>
Answer:
B) False
Explanation:
The term "constitutional theory" refers to two aspects of constitutional law. First, it refers to general theories of the Constitution, which deal with the overall structure of the government, the relations among the branches, and the relation between the national and state governments. Second, it refers to theories of judicial review, which provide justifications for the occasions on which the courts, ruling on constitutional issues, will and will not displace the judgments of elected officials.
