The style of interaction might seem to be the only way for couples whose backgrounds are completely irreconcilable to survive is obliteration style.
Some couples will try the obliteration fashion. In this situation, each partner tries to erase or obliterate their authentic cultures and create a brand new “subculture” with new beliefs, values, and behaviors.
Style of interaction for an intercultural couple in which both companions try and erase their character cultures.
Culture is a prime component that transforms passionate love into romantic love. Cultural values and traditional behaviors affect the expressions and reports of love and transfer passionate love as primarily based on a sexual attraction into romantic love as an idealized and culturally affected manner of loving.
Learn more about obliteration style here brainly.com/question/17134967
#SPJ4
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
a. Prepare a CVP income statement that shows both total and per unit amounts.
CVP INCOME STATEMENT
Per unit. Total
Sales (500 units). 400. 200,000
Variable expense 280 140,000
Contribution margin. 120 60,000
Fixed expense. 48,000
Net operating Income. 12,000
b. Compute Norton's breakeven in units.
Breakeven point = 48000 / 120 = 400
c. Prepare a CVP income statement for the break-even point that shows both total and per unit amounts.
CVP income statement for the break-even point
Per unit. Total
Sales (400 units). 400. 160,000
Variable expense 280 112,000
Contribution margin. 120 48000
Fixed expense. 48,000
Net operating Income. 0
Answer:
See bellow
Explanation:
With regards to the above, Rouse total stockholder's equity is computed as;
= Preferred stock + common stock + paid in capital in excess of par (preferred stock and common stock) + retained earnings - Treasury stock
= $150,000 + $1,950,000 + $60,000 + $27,000,000 + $7,650,000 - $630,000
= $53,730,000
Answer: B. Job performance
Explanation:
Job performance simply means the level to which the job responsibilities of an employee is being successfully fulfilled by the person.
Since the factors being evaluated are the amount of time that the trainer spends with each of his trainees, the coverage of key points, his success rate in turning out trained salespeople within the amount of time allotted etc, then it can be infer that his job performance is being evaluated.
Here are the common technical causes of analysis paralysis:
Analysis barely gives a clear answer as to what discussion is best.
The purpose of the analysis is not sufficiently clear, so analysts produce data that doesn't shed any light on what action to take.
