Speaker 1: The will of the people is what is best for society.
Speaker 2: People exchange some of their individual freedoms for protection by the government.
Speaker 3: Governments should be divided into branches that are <span>separate but equal.
</span>Speaker 4: Governments derive their powers from the consent of the <span>people.
The </span><span>Baron de Montesquieu would most likely agree with the Speaker 3, as it was Montesquieu who theorize first that a government should be divided into branches that are separated but equal (the three branches should be executive, legislative and judiciary), in order to avoid that one of the three could acquire more power than the other and as a form of control of democracy.</span>
Freud would say that is, "it has been sublimated into a socially desirable behavior." This is sort of a defense mechanism, in which socially inadmissible driving forces or admirations are unwittingly changed into socially adequate activities or conduct, perhaps bringing about a long haul transformation of the underlying motivation.
Answer:
I enjoyed how I was able to actually see how the foundations of the US government came from people who weren't perfect. The musical doesn't try to show them in a perfect light where they are all saints who are to be praised at all times. No, it shows that they made mistakes and that this government was created with perfection, but it has allowed so many people to influence the world we live in today.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
