No literature should not be sensored
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
The biggest and most notable reason why oligopolies exist is collaboration. A lot of Firms see more economic advantages in collaborating on a precise price than in trying to battle and drag price competitively with their competitors. By controlling prices in a cartel like way, oligopolies are able to raise their difficulty to entry.
A few oligopolists whose products I make use of are GMC, Samsung, Dell, Apple, UPS, and BP.
Oligopoly is differentiated from monopolistic competition in that oligopoly is comprised of a small number of businesses and they have distinguished or homogeneous products and trying to break-in into their line of business is very difficult.
<span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
</span><span /></span>an oligarchy is best defined as a government ruled by a small, elite group
Answer:
The biggest difference is in their locations.
Explanation:
<em>Suburbs</em> are places to live just outside of the city and the city can be easily accessible. It means that people living in the suburbs can enjoy the city's life if they want to: they still have to have a car or other means of transport to get to the city but the distance is not too great. They can easily go to the movies or to a particular restaurant and return home for the night. Most commuting workers live in the suburbs and so do families with small children who seek a peaceful area for their children to grow in.
<em>Exurbs </em>are located farther from the city, often in rural areas or in coastal resorts. They are suitable for people who look for complete privacy and who do not need to be in the city every day. They may be retired people or people who work from home. Exurbs are also used as a place for a second residence.
Answer: d. negligent hiring.
Explanation:
Negligence hiring is known to occur when an employer employ employees or workers without examining their records in their previous place of employment. It is a claim which holds an employer accountable for his employees act. It is expected that an employer of labour should know about his employee’s previous employment history and background before hiring them. Thus, the employer is held responsible for not doing a thorough background check on the employee which shows that he is not truthful or honest and can cause harm.
