To receive; obtain.
ex: you will inherit your grandfather's watch.
It originated in the 2nd millennium BCE as Vedic Sanskrit, <span>tracing its ancestry back to Proto-Indo-Iranian and Proto-Indo-European</span>
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:
There is not difference, only that 'Soviet Communism' existed when russia was the USSR. Russia is still communist but not as the USSR.
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
It is always very important to deliver speeches that are very unique, addressing the context or the situation at that time. When the speech is being delivered using another unrelated concept created by someone else, the speaker may likely seem very insincere before the audience, and they may also not be able to understand why the speaker talks quite differently from the issue at hand. The listeners can as well lack engagement with his speech as seen in the case of Walter.
