Which journalistic decisions would violate the code of ethics set by the Society of Professional Journalists? Select two options
. a.A newspaper places an ad on the page opposite an article about foreign policy.
b.A journalist reports on a series of robberies that occurred in his own neighborhood.
c.A reporter writes a story about his wife’s company without revealing their relationship.
d.A magazine runs a series of articles speculating about a celebrity’s medical history. An editor refuses to publish an article about a politician due to questionable sources.
<h3>A reporter writes a story about his wife’s company without revealing their relationship.
</h3><h3>A magazine runs a series of articles speculating about a celebrity’s medical history.</h3>
The decision from any journalist that violates the ethics of journalism is "A reporter writes a story about his wife’s company without revealing their relationship" and "A magazine runs a series of articles speculating about a celebrity’s medical history".
Option: (c) and (d)
<u>Explanation:</u>
Society of Professional Journalists is the organization that represents the entire journalists of United States and it sets the boundary line for the journalist’s activities.
For any journalist who attempts to write about the company of his wife without any mentioned relationship of theirs, it would violate the law.
Similarly, it is beyond the ethics to write the series of reports about the medical history of celebrity.
Due to globalization, some of the culture rituals in which boys are required to engage in violent rituals and sometimes in bloodletting of various kinds, have declined in frequency, or have even disappeared. The term globalization denotes a process of interaction and integration among cultures, people and removal of barriers between national economies.
Bc ppl don't have the money to go watch "live" anymore bc the jacked the prices up big time when my dad was growing up tickets were $20 know there like $200+