<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
Use a rigid transformation to prove that angle NPO is congruent to angle NLM
=====================================================
Explanation:
The AA stands for "angle angle". So we need two pairs of angles to prove the triangles to be similar. The first pair of angles is the vertical angles ONP and MNL, which are congruent. Any pair of vertical angles are always congruent.
The second pair of angles could either be
- angle NOP = angle NML
- angle NPO = angle NLM
so we have a choice on which to pick. The pairing angle NOP = angle NML is not listed in the answer choices, but angle NPO = angle NLM is listed as choice B.
Saying angle NLM = angle LMN is not useful because those two angles are part of the same triangle. The two angles must be in separate triangles to be able to tie the triangles together.
We would use a rigid transformation to have angle NPO move to angle NLM, or vice versa through the use of a rotation and a translation.
Let's simplify step-by-step.
2/
5
y−4+7−
9
/10
y
=
2
/5
y+−4+7+
−9
/10
y
Combine Like Terms: =
2
/5
y+−4+7+
−9
/10
y
(2
/5
y+
−9
/10
y)+(−4+7)
=
−1
/2
y+3
Answer: =
−1
/2
y+3
Hope I could help! :)
Answer:
80
Step-by-step explanation:
A quadrilateral measured 360. if you do not know that you can multiply 360 by 2 because there are 2 triangles in a quadrilateral. Then you subtract 360 by 75,115, and 90. And you will get 80 degrees
Layla bu la 520 and glue 729
B the answer is b because yiu do like add e square 27 +* 9 + x = 8 -/273/73
