1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PSYCHO15rus [73]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following statements is false? Using a cost-benefit analysis approach to your buying decisions will make you a wise

consumer. Your choices as a consumer have no impact on the larger social environment. In addition to economic savings, wise consumers also enjoy improved health and have a positive impact on the larger social and even global environment. Being a wise consumer involves developing a variety of skills, from product research to careful comparative analysis.
Social Studies
2 answers:
MAXImum [283]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

your choices as a consumer have no impact on the larger social environment

Explanation:

Your choices as a consumer have a huge impact on the larger social environment because as a consumer certain consumer behavior like drinking and driving or smoking in a non-smoking area does not only endanger your life but the health and life of the larger social environment where you find yourself at the time, therefore the statement  ; your choices as a consumer have no impact on the larger social environment is false and very wrong. wise consumers enjoy improved health system and impact their environment positively

Alja [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Your choices as a consumer have no impact on the larger social environment.

Explanation:

From the given options, we can state that the following statement is false i.e. Your choices as a consumer have no impact on the larger social environment. Our choices as a consumer tends to have a huge impact on our surroundings especially the larger social environment. Our choice affect the forces of supply and demand , and thus everything related to it.

You might be interested in
Which of these is NOT included in the Great Seal?
goblinko [34]

I think that the answer is B) Peaches,

Because all the other ones are cloth

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A lower GDP per capita is a sign that a country is more developed. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
kari74 [83]

Answer:

The answer is false  

Explanation:

here's some other questions if you wanna get smarter in the link.

Download pdf
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the civil service system
Tatiana [17]

I don't know what you mean, but it is a noun. Those branches of public service concerned with all governmental administrative functions outside the armed services. the body of persons employed in these branches. a system or method of appointing government employees on the basis of competitive examinations, rather than by political patronage.

4 0
3 years ago
Recall that Milgram conducted a variation on his original obedience experiment. In this variation, there were two confederates i
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

Normative social influence

Explanation:

The Milgram Experiment was an experiment on the obedience to authority figures. It comprises of a lot of social psychology experiments. The scientisy was a Yale University Psychologist called Stanley Milgram. The goal of the experiment was to measure the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who give instructions to them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience.

Milgram shared what two theories which are;

1. Theory of conformism

2. Agentic state theory

Normative social influence os simply defined as the act of conforming because we want to be liked and want to fit into a group. Its examples includes Friendship group type things, smoking/drug taking, types of music and dress sense etc.

3 0
3 years ago
Briefly summarize the facts of the Dred Scott case and discuss the impact that the decision had on the growing conflict between
Viktor [21]

Answer:

"In April 1846, Dred and Harriet filed separate lawsuits for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court against Irene Emerson based on two Missouri statutes. One statute allowed any person of any color to sue for wrongful enslavement. The other stated that any person taken to a free territory automatically became free and could not be re-enslaved upon returning to a slave state.

Neither Dred nor Harriet Scott could read or write, and needed both logistical and financial support to plead their case. They received it from their church, abolitionists and an unlikely source, the Blow family who had once owned them.  

Since Dred and Harriet Scott had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory — both free domains — they hoped they had a persuasive case. When they went to trial on June 30, 1847, however, the court ruled against them on a technicality and the judge granted a retrial.

The Scott’s went to trial again in January 1850 and won their freedom. Irene appealed the case to the Missouri Supreme Court which combined Dred and Harriet’s cases and reversed the lower court’s decision in 1852, making Dred Scott and his family slaves again.  

In November 1853, Scott filed a federal lawsuit with the United States Circuit Court for the District of Missouri. By this time, Irene had transferred Scott and his family to her brother, John Sanford (although it was determined later that she retained ownership). On May 15, 1854, the federal court heard Dred Scott v. Sanford and ruled against Scott, holding him and his family in slavery.  

In December 1854, Scott appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court. The trial began on February 11, 1856. By this time, the case had gained notoriety and Scott received support from many abolitionists, including powerful politicians and high-profile attorneys. But on March 6, 1857, in the infamous Dred Scott decision, Scott lost his fight for freedom again...... By the time the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its Dred Scott decision, Irene had married her second husband, Calvin Chaffee, a U.S. congressman and abolitionist. Upset upon learning his wife still owned the most infamous slave of the time, he sold Scott and his family to Taylor Blow, the son of Peter Blow, Scott’s original owner.  

Taylor freed Scott and his family on May 26, 1857. Scott found work as a porter in a St. Louis hotel, but didn’t live long as a free man. At about 59 years of age, Scott died from tuberculosis on September 17, 1858."

Explanation:

Source: https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/dred-scott-case

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which term refers to the results of one's actions, which will ultimately impact one's destiny?
    11·2 answers
  • Our tendency to believe we know more than we do illustrates question 5 options: naturalistic observation. the placebo effect. ov
    6·1 answer
  • What is the subject in Jacob has a pet frog
    14·1 answer
  • Computer scored Unit Test
    11·1 answer
  • The situation I find myself in is very threatening. In other situations, I do okay, but in this particular situation, I don't th
    5·1 answer
  • Read this lead to a news story:
    12·1 answer
  • After conquering greece, Philip dream was to?
    5·1 answer
  • According to the attribution theory, if a behavior scores *BLANK*, we tend to attribute it to external causes. A. low on distinc
    5·1 answer
  • Please help !!<br> Who was the leader of the Communist Party of china ?
    15·2 answers
  • how did you learn the way of interacting ang behaving with other members supported you to be socialized present your experience​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!