Answer:
mark brainliest :))
Explanation:
Because baldness is a sex-linked trait.
In other words, men are simply more likely to express the trait for baldness than women are, because they only need one set of genes for baldness, while women need two.
If, for example, for each gene there is a 1/2 chance that the gene will be for baldness and 1/2 that it will not, then men have a 1/2 chance (because 1/2^1 = 1/2) of being bald, while women have a 1/4 chance (because 1/2^2 = 1/4) of being bald.
This is the reason it's called "male-pattern baldness": it is more common in males. However, this does not explain nor rule out the dearth of women with baldness-women can get it too: it's just less common
Answer: The observation "A" leads us to conclude that the finches populations are from two different species
Explanation:
According to the biological concept of species, <em>a set of individuals are from the same species if they are able to reproduce and leave fertile offspring</em>. This is key so one species can be successful and perpetuate through time. If they cannot leave descendants, then the species will be extinct. However, it’s possible that two individuals from different species mate and have descendants, but they cannot leave fertile offspring. When they are from different species, the offspring will be sterile and it is called a hybrid.
In the case of the South American finch, the island's finch population and mainland's finch population belong to different species because their offspring is sterile. To have different features, as different feather's color, or to have other dietary preference is not enough to say that they are different species. This is because within the same species, individuals can have variations. For example, we can different eye color and belong to the same species.
ID isn't even genuine science, and it's an affront to religion too: their hypotheses make God look moronic and compel him to things that we don't yet get it. What ID advocates do is they discover something that isn't yet comprehended (at a certain point, it was a bacterial flagellum) and essentially wave their hands and say "God did it!", and afterward when that thing has been legitimately clarified by genuine researchers, they discover something else that hasn't been clarified yet and rehash the process.
B. Cells reproduce independently and viruses require a host to reproduce
The best conclusion is to do the experiment twice
