Answer:
No, none that I am aware of. In Shakespeare’s time, a tragedy meant that the main character falls from fortune to disaster, normally because of a flaw or fate. Obviously, other characters may be unharmed, or may even benefit from the protagonist’s downfall. I’m not writing to make fun of other posters, but we could as easily call the Matrix a tragedy because Agent Smith loses, or say that Titanic has a happy ending for coffin salesmen. Yes, Macduff or Fortinbras do well at the end of their plays, but they are not the protagonists.
For that reason, because a pre-modern tragedy definitionally means that the hero falls, and that’s what happens in Shakespeare’s plays, I’d say no. There are “problem” plays such as the Merchant of Venice, where the opposite happens—a comedy has a partly sad ending, with Shylock’s defeat—but again, it’s all in what the protagonist does, and Antonio (the merchant) wins at its close when his ships return
A. Bigamy, the suffix "gamy" is the Greek root for marriage.
Try to talk to someone you love you about it my friend, it’s hard i know but it’s better to go through with family and friends rather then alone :)
In contemporary hunter-gatherer tribes, men and women tend to have equal influence on where their group lives and who they live with. Hunter-gatherer's had leisure time, a balanced diet, and an equal society in terms of specialization of labor by gender.
Love is wonderful, love is joy, love is the greatest thing in the world… ... We're going to see what the research says makes real relationships last so you can get as
