1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VMariaS [17]
3 years ago
5

Raleigh, a 55-year-old experienced sales representative at BigCo, is terminated and replaced with Connelly at a lower pay rate.

Connelly is 36 years old with no experience in sales. Assuming that no party has a valid defense, who prevails in Raleigh's ADEA claim against BigCo?
Law
1 answer:
Scrat [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: The correct answer is Raleigh.

Explanation: The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) prohibits employers from discrimination against an employee on the basis of age once the employee reaches age 40.

However, in the Raleigh's ADEA claim with no valid defence Raleigh will prevail because Connelly at age 36 years is substantially younger than Raleigh who is 55 years old.

You might be interested in
How is an ordinance different from a precedent? Write in a point.​
gregori [183]

Ordinance Is a law or decree by a municipality. Meanwhile precedent a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar fact, or similar legal issues.

6 0
1 year ago
Because of the dominance of the two-party system, ______________ candidates often struggle to raise both funds and the visibilit
Vinvika [58]

Answer:

third party

Explanation:

edge2021

3 0
2 years ago
When an individual tries to sue in order to receive compensation for some injury, it falls under _____. a. Criminal law b. Civil
borishaifa [10]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

im pretty sure thats the answer. i dont have much experence in law but thats what i keep getting :)

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
witness testifies in front of the jury that he saw the defendant enter the convenience store about one minute before he heard gu
fredd [130]

Answer:

Testimonial evidence

Explanation:

Testimonial evidence is evidence provided by people who were in the vicinity of the area where the case was located, and who, under oath, assure that they saw or heard something related to the case.

In the question, we have a typical example of testimonial evidence because a witness is assuring that he saw the defendant in the area that is related to the case, but is not necessarily providing any other type of evidence to support that claim. Whether the testimony is considered truthful or not, or relevant or not, depends on the context of the case, and on the ultimate decision of the jury.

3 0
2 years ago
Evaluate the noor mukadam case in light of physiological perspective
olga2289 [7]

Therapy Works, a counselling and psychotherapy service, on Tuesday issued a statement against the "baseless and false allegations" it said were being levelled against it following the gruesome killing of Noor Mukadam in Islamabad.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The development of DNA profiling as well as the creation of national databases for both DNA profiling
    14·2 answers
  • I hate it<br> its sooodum
    14·2 answers
  • East Coast Furniture is considering submitting a proposal for a $50,000
    7·1 answer
  • What was the law or issue in Miranda V. Arizona case
    10·1 answer
  • S
    13·1 answer
  • Que es la participacion ciudadana
    7·2 answers
  • Define communism(by experience or by own perspective)​
    7·1 answer
  • What type of law does a lawyer who works to protect non-citizens practice? Refugee law Immigration law International law Civil r
    6·1 answer
  • Why is it important to carefully document an interview? a. You can learn from the problems and successes during the interview b.
    10·1 answer
  • Why do you have to pay for brainly it suck now ‍♂️‍♂️‍♂️​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!