1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Diano4ka-milaya [45]
3 years ago
5

What was the significance of taiwan after the red army took control of china in 1949?

History
1 answer:
TEA [102]3 years ago
5 0
Taiwan became important because an exile government of China was formed there that claimed to be the rightful government of China. This caused China to have two governments, one that ruled China which was the communist one and one in exile which claimed their right to have power over China but couldn't actually use that power in any way. The problem still exists today and other countries have mostly been neutral on this question.
You might be interested in
How do you explain the rise and fall of the Klan in different periods of US history?
EastWind [94]
I guess you just have to search it up loll
3 0
3 years ago
A closed circuit allows electricity to flow.
vaieri [72.5K]
False this is false it’s closed so no electricity will flow through
4 0
2 years ago
In The Hobbit, how does the complicating incident of Bilbo's encounter with Smaug affect his relationship with the dwarves?
GenaCL600 [577]

Answer:

It strengthens his relationship with the dwarves

Explanation:

I took the test

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why do people take an oath to support the constitution instead of the country or the president and why every american should tak
notsponge [240]
The reason why people take an oath to support the Constitution instead of the country or the President is because the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, have has power even over the present himself. It is not required that every American take this oath--it is a personal choice. <span />
4 0
3 years ago
Grant’s policy to win the war was one of <br> what
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do spiritual songs help Empower slave
    12·2 answers
  • Which statements about the world's rain forests are true
    9·1 answer
  • Gradually, American society came to accept that girls could be educated and that women could be ____
    10·2 answers
  • The Forbidden City was given its name because ___.
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement is an accurate description of the way the conquistadors treated native Americans
    16·1 answer
  • How did the balance of power in Europe shift as a result of World War One
    10·1 answer
  • What was the effect of anti-Chinese riots and discriminatory acts against Chinese immigrants in the 1800s?
    9·1 answer
  • What are the primary roles of government in a market economy?
    14·1 answer
  • What was Germany’s main goal after World War I?
    8·1 answer
  • If you are preparing to tow a small trailer
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!