All categories

3 years ago

Yeah I don’t get this

Mathematics

1 answer:

umka2103 [35]3 years ago

8 0

using pythagorean theorem

a^2 + b^2 = c^2

(12x)^2 + (16x)^2 = 10^2

square each term

144x^2 + 256x^2 = 100

combine like terms

400 x^2 = 100

divide by 400 on each side

x^2 = 1/4

take the square root on each side

x = 1/2

Answer: x=1/2

You might be interested in

PLZZZ HELP ME Evaluate the expression 4 • 6(2 + 9√) + 1.

KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

121 assuming that 9 $\\ \sqrt \\$ is the square root of 9

Step-by-step explanation:

I plugged it into my calculator, but use PEMDAS and you can get the answer.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Solve step - by - step. 5b-1>=-11 Plz help!

maks197457 [2]

It would -2 because you have to bring over the -1 on the other side of the equal sign. so you would do -11 plus 1 and you will get -10 then you would 5b÷-10 (simplify).5b=-10
b=-2

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Stock Market Nadia is a stockbroker. She earns 13% commission each week. Last week, she sold $5,300 worth of stocks. How muc

Natali [406]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Simplify the following expressions by using distributive property. 3x^2(4x-3)

mr_godi [17]

Answer:

12x^3-9x^2

Step-by-step explanation:

$3x^2(4x-3)= \\\\3x^2(4x)+3x^2(-3)= \\\\12x^3-9x^2$

Hope this helps!

5 0

3 years ago

Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of t

Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

This data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $\sigma_{1}^{2}$ be the variance for the population of weight gains for rats given a low dose, and $\sigma_{2}^{2}$ the variance for the population of weight gains for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide.

We want to test $H_{0}: \sigma_{1}^{2} = \sigma_{2}^{2}$ vs $H_{1}: \sigma_{1}^{2} > \sigma_{2}^{2}$ . We have that the sample standard deviation for $n_{2} = 22$ female control rats was $s_{2} = 28$ g and for $n_{1} = 18$ female low-dose rats was $s_{1} = 51$ g. So, we have observed the value

$F = \frac{s_{1}^{2}}{s_{2}^{2}} = \frac{(51)^{2}}{(28)^{2}} = 3.3176$ which comes from a F distribution with $n_{1} - 1 = 18 - 1 = 17$ degrees of freedom (numerator) and $n_{2} - 1 = 22 - 1 = 21$ degrees of freedom (denominator).

As we want carry out a test of hypothesis at the significance level of 0.05, we should find the 95th quantile of the F distribution with 17 and 21 degrees of freedom, this value is 2.1389. The rejection region is given by {F > 2.1389}, because the observed value is 3.3176 > 2.1389, we reject the null hypothesis. So, this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains.

8 0

3 years ago