Answer: I personally remember things better by writing them down and listening because you activate another part of the brain when you write things down.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer:
a chief justice of the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
The area in which <span>agriculture begin to develop between 9000 bce and 1000 bce is: Modern day central Argenina.
The southern American region has a nutrient rich soil and perfect warm temperature that support the majority of plants. This provided agricultural sector the opportunity to flourish</span>
