Answer:
A concentration approach
Explanation:
In simple words, The Concentration strategy relates to a proactive approach where the focus of a corporation is a trading bloc or component. This helps the organisation to spend more money in manufacturing as well as marketing within that one region, but increase the chance of substantial losses in case of a decline in revenue or a rise in competition.
Answer:
a. the income effect.
Explanation:
The income effect is the change in demand with respect to the good or service that due to change in the purchasing power of the consumer results in change in real income
Since in the situation it is mentioned that she received a big bonus this year and she decided for a trip to europe so here the purchasing power would be changed due to the income effect
hence, the option a is correct
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is D, which is "Interdependent"
Explanation:
Because many of the people work in a team but that team does not a team or they are not a team member, if they work separately in a chamber, and meet your team folks only in the meeting, then u are not a real team. If we are not interdependent to our team members then we not really a team, we called a team or a team member only at that time, when we work interdependently.
so that's why it is important to work in a team and also work interdependently
Answer:
So project two is better because it will increase the wealth of Chandler Tire by $ 18,598.33 more than Project 1
Explanation:
<em>To determine which project to be selected, we will compute the present value (PV) of the two projects and select the one with a higher PV.</em>
Present value is the today worth of the future cash inflows from a project. The higher the present value the more wealth is been created. So a project with a higher PV is better if two are been compared.
So when comparing two projects, the one with a higher PV is better.
<em>PV of Poject 1 </em>
PV = 52,000 × 1-(1.015)^(-6)
$196,793.10
<em>PV of Project 2</em>
PV = 48,000 × 1- (1.015)^(-8)
$215,391.43
So project two is better because it will increase the wealth of Chandler Tire by $ 18,598.33 more than Project 1
Answer:
The correct answer is B
Explanation:
Resources are used efficiently in the sunhat market because when marginal social benefit equals marginal social cost, total surplus is maximized. Thus, From the given four options only the option B is the correct option.
MSC = Marginal Social cost
MSB = Marginal Social Benefit
It is becuase in the competitive market, the quantity that is supplied in the market in same to the quantity which is demanded.