1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
velikii [3]
3 years ago
8

In Furman v. Georgia (1972), the Supreme Court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had denied Furman the right

to be represented by counsel. violated Furman’s right to a quick and speedy trial. established unclear standards for applying the death penalty. exceeded the annual quota of death penalties it could impose.
Law
2 answers:
choli [55]3 years ago
5 0
Established unclear standards for applying the death penalty.
Sergeeva-Olga [200]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C- Established unclear standards for applying the death penalty

Explanation:

Edg2020

You might be interested in
Which of these action would be protected by the first amendment
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

Explanation:

where is the picture and without it people wont be able to help u

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Tim
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

the fourth amendment

Explanation:

the fourth amendment states you must have probable cause to search someone

5 0
3 years ago
Give an example of a good service produced in the united states using the market model.
kobusy [5.1K]

Answer:

There are 4 basic market models: pure competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and pure monopoly. ... The best examples of a purely competitive market are agricultural products, such as corn, wheat, and soybeans.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Suppose a defendant is convicted at trial but believes that the judge made an error that impacted the decision. She would first
densk [106]

Initially, a defendant's case is at a trial court (Federal, State, Circuit Courts).

Then the case proceeds to the Court of Appeal before finally moving to the Supreme Court of the state or at the federal level.

But it is not true that all cases must move to the Supreme Court when the defendant appeals. The movement to the highest court requires the acceptance of the defendant's argument and the merit of each case.

Thus, the defendant's case can move from a <em>trial court,</em><em> an </em><em>appeals court,</em><em> and then to the </em><em>supreme court.</em>

Learn more: brainly.com/question/11640159

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Most of us paying attention recognize that these Hearings are basically a formality, in that, Republicans will vote for Barrett
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

no because she needs to be conformed

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help with which box that the tiles go to!
    14·1 answer
  • Cuales son las controversias, hechos, las pruebas, sentencias, los acusados y las victimas en el caso de Escobedo vs Illinois?
    6·1 answer
  • 8.
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the steps in the arrest and prosecution of someone who is accused of a felony. Your response should be at least 150 word
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following powers is reserved for the state governments?
    5·1 answer
  • The type of government we have in the United State. A government
    5·2 answers
  • A sales representative in a shopping centre handed Karl a flyer promoting a style cut and shave for $12 at Lion’s Mane Barber Sh
    10·1 answer
  • Decide whether each
    7·1 answer
  • Stacy is a fraud examiner working on a case with international participants. which agency maintains a database that might help h
    12·2 answers
  • How does federalism affect lawmaking in the United States?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!